+1 non binding. Checked by running my existing example DAGs, no regressions.
Thanks & Regards, Amogh Desai On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 10:51 PM Vishnu Chilukoori <vish.chiluko...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 non-binding > > -- > Regards, > Vishnu Chilukoori > > On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 12:10 PM Jens Scheffler <j_scheff...@gmx.de.invalid > > > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package build, > > Licenses, Signatures > > > > I briefly tested and deployed the FAB 1.5.3 into Airflow 2.10.4 and it > > seems all is looking good. Just did basic tests. > > > > On 04.02.25 23:03, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is > > > calling a vote on the release, > > > which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on February > > 07, > > > 2025 21:58 PM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received. > > > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1. > > > > > > This is a bugfix release of the fab provider. > > > > > > Airflow Providers are available at: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/ > > > > > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary > > > Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the > > provider > > > packages. > > > > > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary > > > Python "wheel" release. > > > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members > > > > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC > is > > > described in: > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors > > > > > > > > > Public keys are available at: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS > > > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community > are > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". > > > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string. > > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release. > > > > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here: > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/46442 > > > > > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the > RC > > > candidates. > > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the > > documentation > > > after the > > > RC candidates are released. > > > > > > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links: > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/1.5.3rc1/ > > > > > > Cheers, > > > J. > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > > > > >
