Looks like `[LAZY CONSENSUS]` candidate to me :)

On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 11:23 PM Oliveira, Niko <oniko...@amazon.com.invalid>
wrote:

> +1 as well,l I've never liked the default on behaviour for this config.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Jens Scheffler <j_scheff...@gmx.de.INVALID>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 12:54:05 PM
> To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [EXT] [DISCUSSION] Changing catchup_by_default from True to
> False
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
>
>
> AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un expéditeur externe.
> Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jointe si vous ne pouvez
> pas confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si vous n’êtes pas certain que
> le contenu ne présente aucun risque.
>
>
>
> +1 - I would also favor this proposal.
>
> On 05.03.25 21:25, Akash Sharma wrote:
> > +1 We should change it from both global and DAG level.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Akash
> >
> > On Thu, 6 Mar, 2025, 01:01 Jed Cunningham, <jedcunning...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> +1, this is one of the few configs that I change from the default
> >> immediately.
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to