It looks like it's already added in the draft PR. Like in "provider_info.schema.json". Is that what you mean?
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 at 17:22, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: > Great idea. We might want to add it also to more "provider info" stuff > (does not have to be this PR - likely when we create 2nd or 3rd bundle). > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 5:14 PM Ephraim Anierobi < > ephraimanier...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I would like to propose moving the Git DAG bundle to a new Git provider. > > > > As part of AIP-66, we created a versioned Git DAG bundle(a new term) in > > the dag_processing package with a plan to eventually move it into its own > > provider package. > > > > Looking at the possibility of having other similar versioned bundles e.g > > S3 or Google Storage etc, I decided to create a new provider called git > and > > have the bundle live in the bundle's package inside the provider. Here’s > a > > draft PR of the proposed provider: > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/47636 > > > > I’m happy to hear what you think. > > > > Ephraim > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > > > > >
