Same :) On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 11:30 AM Wei Lee <weilee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Love this! > > Best, > Wei > > > On Mar 20, 2025, at 4:15 AM, Daniel Standish > <daniel.stand...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > > > > In what may go down as the most important PR of Airflow 3.0 (not to brag > or > > anything), I have gone through the docs and renamed DAGs to Dags: > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/47959 > > > > Recall there was some previous discussion on dev list where there was > > general agreement to de-emphasize the cyborg-sounding "directed acyclic > > graph" concept: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/lktrzqkzrpvc1cyctxz7zxfmc0fwtq2j > > > > I won't rehash the arguments in detail here. But I did notice that > already > > we use `Dags` in the UI (which I like), so hey, we're sort of already > there > > and maybe lazy consensus is not necessary. But, just for visibility. > The > > PR is docs only. > > > > Thanks > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > >
