+1 (non-binding).

Verified all AIPs and regression tests:

   - Running example DAGs
   - API
   - CLI



Thanks, everyone, for all the development and testing efforts—cheers to
Airflow 3!
Regards,
Rahul Vats

On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 at 13:47, Amogh Desai <amoghdesai....@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 non binding.
>
> Had only one change in this RC but generally tested out my changes and
> general poking around.
>
> Looking good! Kudos to everyone for the biggest Airflow release so far!
>
> Looking forward to the release announcement!
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Amogh Desai
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 1:44 PM Ankit Chaurasia <sunank...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding). Amazing work, everyone!
> >
> > *Ankit Chaurasia*
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 1:33 PM Phani Kumar
> > <phani.ku...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding) 🙌
> > >
> > > Thanks for all the hard work — it’s been a wild ride since the RCs were
> > cut
> > > 🚀 and we finally made it! 🎉
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 12:40 PM Pankaj Koti
> > > <pankaj.k...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding).
> > > >
> > > > Huge kudos to all the contributors and maintainers for their
> incredible
> > > > effort in reaching this remarkable milestone.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 12:26 PM kalyan reddy <kalyan.be...@live.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1(non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Exciting!!!
> > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > From: Jed Cunningham <jedcunning...@apache.org>
> > > > > Sent: 22 April 2025 12:14
> > > > > To: dev@airflow.apache.org <dev@airflow.apache.org>
> > > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 3.0.0 from 3.0.0rc4 & Task SDK
> > > 1.0.0
> > > > > from 1.0.0rc4
> > > > >
> > > > > Jens, you might want to recast your vote :)
> > > > >
> > > > > From
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#expressing-votes-1-0-1-and-fractions
> > > > > :
> > > > >
> > > > > "Votes from PMC Members on releases must use +1, 0, -1 to be
> > considered
> > > > > binding."
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to