+1 to https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/49532

Looks like a tremendous amount of thoughtful and persistent work there!

On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 1:16 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:

> Changing my vote to https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/49532  -
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/49468 combo.
>
> On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 9:44 PM Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > (sry late addition -- I just recalled about those)
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 9 May 2025 at 01:09, Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Both those weren't in the list but they deserve to be recognized (at
> > least
> > > for me) .
> > >
> > >
> > >    - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/49532
> > >    - https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/49468
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 9 May 2025 at 01:07, Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> For me, a huge +1 to https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/49532 &
> > >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/49468
> > >>
> > >> Those were huge lifts
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, 9 May 2025 at 00:45, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +1 #48528
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 8:47 PM Jens Scheffler
> > <j_scheff...@gmx.de.invalid
> > >>> >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > Thanks for the reminder @Amogh... totoally forgot about this:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > +1 for #48528!
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On 08.05.25 08:17, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> > >>> > > Yeah I think our script needs some love :)
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 7:57 AM Amogh Desai <
> > amoghdesai....@gmail.com
> > >>> >
> > >>> > wrote:
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >> I am sure it would have been a big challenge to identify the
> > >>> candidates
> > >>> > >> this time with so
> > >>> > >> many PRs coming this time.
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> Although, just wondering if we missed any with the #protm
> labels?
> > >>> Like,
> > >>> > I
> > >>> > >> can recall this one
> > >>> > >> at least: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48528
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> Thanks & Regards,
> > >>> > >> Amogh Desai
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 1:31 AM Briana Okyere
> > >>> > >> <briana.oky...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >>> Hey All,
> > >>> > >>>
> > >>> > >>> It’s once again time to vote for the PR of the Month!
> > >>> > >>>
> > >>> > >>> With the help of Jarek and Kaxil (working on improving the PR
> > >>> script!)
> > >>> > >>> we've identified the following candidates:
> > >>> > >>>
> > >>> > >>> PR #48914: Add airflowctl codegen <
> > >>> > >>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/48914>
> > >>> > >>>
> > >>> > >>> PR #49475: Add external logs link <
> > >>> > >>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/49475>
> > >>> > >>>
> > >>> > >>> PR #45124: skip setproctitle in task_runner on Mac OS <
> > >>> > >>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/45124>
> > >>> > >>>
> > >>> > >>> PR #47446: Create Apache TinkerPop provider <
> > >>> > >>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/47446>
> > >>> > >>>
> > >>> > >>> PR #49045: Handle 'fail_fast' dags with task sdk and execution
> > API
> > >>> > >> server <
> > >>> > >>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/49045>
> > >>> > >>>
> > >>> > >>> Please reply to this thread with your selection or offer your
> own
> > >>> > >>> nominee(s).
> > >>> > >>>
> > >>> > >>> Voting will close on Friday, May 9th at 10 AM PST. The
> winner(s)
> > >>> will
> > >>> > be
> > >>> > >>> featured in the next issue of the Airflow newsletter.
> > >>> > >>>
> > >>> > >>> Also, if there’s an article or event that you think should be
> > >>> included
> > >>> > in
> > >>> > >>> this or a future issue of the newsletter, please drop me a line
> > at
> > >>> <
> > >>> > >>> briana.oky...@astronomer.io>
> > >>> > >>>
> > >>> > >>> --
> > >>> > >>> Briana Okyere
> > >>> > >>>
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org
> > >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
>

Reply via email to