This is great! Thank you, Kaxil. Regards, Rahul Vats
On Sat, 10 May 2025 at 10:14, Pavankumar Gopidesu <gopidesupa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Great, Thanks kaxil. > > Pavan > > On Sat, May 10, 2025, 02:52 Aritra Basu <aritrabasu1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 🙌 Woohoo! > > -- > > Regards, > > Aritra Basu > > > > On Sat, 10 May 2025, 4:20 am Vikram Koka, <vik...@astronomer.io.invalid> > > wrote: > > > > > Oh, excellent work! > > > Excited to see this working. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Vikram > > > > > > On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 2:24 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Woohoooo > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 10:42 PM Daniel Standish > > > > <daniel.stand...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > > > > great! > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 12:54 PM Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > > > > > I am happy to share that `dag.test` has now been ported over to > use > > > the > > > > > > Task SDK execution path as part of > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/50300 . > > > > > > > > > > > > This change eliminates one of the last remaining places in > Airflow > > > that > > > > > > still relied on the old execution flow from Airflow 2.x, which > > > > permitted > > > > > > direct database access during task runs. With this update, > dag.test > > > now > > > > > > mirrors the same execution logic as production tasks, offering > > > > > consistency > > > > > > between test and runtime behavior. > > > > > > > > > > > > This is one of the last few things that were not using the > "actual" > > > > Task > > > > > > Execution path and instead used the old Airflow 2 execution path > > that > > > > > > allowed DB access. > > > > > > > > > > > > *Note*: If you were relying on `dag.test` for system tests or > local > > > > > > development that accessed the database directly, those patterns > > will > > > no > > > > > > longer work. This is intentional; direct DB access is not part of > > the > > > > > > supported execution model anymore. > > > > > > > > > > > > Please let me know if there are any teething issues that arise > > > because > > > > of > > > > > > that. There are just a few things left before we can completely > > > remove > > > > > the > > > > > > old execution path, and I am excited about that. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Kaxil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
