Cool. I will start a small slack group for it :) On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 1:44 PM Vincent Beck <vincb...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello, > > Just got back from vacations (hence the delay) but I am of course happy to > help in that effort. Upgrading to FAB 5 will unblock many things. > > On 2025/05/07 09:19:17 Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > Wooohoho :) Moar hands and eyes :) > > > > On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 11:13 AM Ankit Chaurasia <sunank...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Hi Jarek, I would like to help with the migration work as well. > > > > > > Regards > > > *Ankit Chaurasia* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 2:51 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Fantastic - thanks Ephraim - I might wait for Vincents' ok and we can > > > form > > > > a small task force to do it :) > > > > > > > > wt., 6 maj 2025, 13:10 użytkownik Ephraim Anierobi < > > > > ephraimanier...@gmail.com> napisał: > > > > > > > > > Hi Jarek, I can help with the migration > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 6 May 2025 at 11:02, Avi <a...@astronomer.io.invalid> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I think it is a good time to revisit > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/28723 > > > > > > - Avi > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 8:17 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Just copying it from the Slack message - devlist seems to be > more > > > > > > > appropriate :). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We got informed by Daniel Gaspar from Superset that he is > gearing > > > for > > > > > > > release of FAB 5.0.0 - and asked us to test a8 release > > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/Flask-AppBuilder/5.0.0a8/ - which > should > > > - > > > > in > > > > > > > principle - unblock us from migrating to SQLAlchemy 2. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I looked at what is needed and we need to do it in two steps. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Step 1: Migrate to 4.6.2 version of FAB -> FAB 4.6.2 added > Group > > > > > support > > > > > > > (which generally is something that might be useful for us as > well - > > > > and > > > > > > > highly requested feature > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Step 2: Test and migrate to SQLAlchemy 2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And I think it's best it's done with Vincent and maybe someone > from > > > > > > > Astronomer who knows more about Sqlalchemy and data migration > than > > > me > > > > > - I > > > > > > > am happy to participate and review, but I do not feel > competent to > > > > > > > implement the changes - I've never added any migration or > > > SQLAlchemy > > > > > > model. > > > > > > > Unfortunately this requires far more than copy & pasting > pieces of > > > > > > > vendored-in FAB security manager. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Years ago a decision was made that we vendor-in part of the > code of > > > > > FAB - > > > > > > > and part of it is vendoring in models and migration and we > need to > > > > > follow > > > > > > > that - unfortunately. > > > > > > > It does not seem a lot of work, but I am afraid I only know > > > > SQLalchemy > > > > > > on a > > > > > > > very surface - there is literally one model (Group) to add and > some > > > > > code > > > > > > to > > > > > > > handle it - including migrations, but also testing the new > group > > > > > feature > > > > > > of > > > > > > > FAB and how it integrates with Airflow is a bit more complex > than > > > > just > > > > > > "new > > > > > > > FAB version migration". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I created a small task for it - without too many details - but > I > > > > think > > > > > we > > > > > > > need a small team (I guess Vincent is the most natural > candidate + > > > > > > someone > > > > > > > from Astro about migrations and SQLAlchemy) who could > implement and > > > > > test > > > > > > > this change. I am happy to review, help to make decisions and > > > discuss > > > > > it > > > > > > > and get the dependencies sorted out. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/50186 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One of the things it will unblock finally if we get to 5.0.0 > is PRs > > > > > like > > > > > > > that https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/50221 where we > cannot > > > > bump > > > > > > the > > > > > > > min version of sendgrid because it conflicts with the infamous > > > > Werkzeug > > > > > > > versions that old FAB depends on. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WDYT? Can we get a small group of people around that task to > do it > > > > > > > "properly"? It would be great to have it as a 3.1.0 > deliverable to > > > > > > finally > > > > > > > cut all our ties with the old FAB things. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > J > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > >
