> Pre-commit is great for its stability but is really failing in terms of
innovation, the project itself does not allow any discussion of using new
standards.

Had my fair share of those discussions in the past and I quite agree.
There is huge difference between "stability" and "stagnation/stubbornness".

On Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 5:39 PM Damian Shaw <ds...@striketechnologies.com>
wrote:

> I just want to say I am very excited to see innovation in this space!
>
> Pre-commit is great for its stability but is really failing in terms of
> innovation, the project itself does not allow any discussion of using new
> standards.
>
> I will be testing it out in my own environments and then promoting it
> widely.
>
> Damian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 7, 2025 10:01 AM
> To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Upcoming pre-commit -> prefligit change
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Early warning about upcoming pre-commit/prefligit change......
>
> Together with Ash and creator of the prefligit:
> https://github.com/j178/prefligit - we are testing and helping to close
> the gaps between prefligit and pre-commit (and later we hope we will be
> able to improve our prefligit integrations with upcoming monorepo support
> especially - which would help us to modularise our pre-fligits (that's the
> name we will likely start using ;) ..
>
> It seems we are very close so I wanted to make a short "upcoming change"
> note so that you are aware:
>
> * *breeze static-checks *will hopefully be gone and replaced by
> `prefligit` command - the author of prefligit is super-receptive to things
> like `--last-commit` flags and autocomplete including our hook names - so I
> think we will be able to remove the whole `static-check` machinery from
> breeze that added what we needed
>
> * *prefiligit* uses *uv* by default - no more `uv tool install pre-commit
> --with pre-commit-uv` needed to enable it (again the author of prefligit is
> way more receptive to the needs of users and there will be no need to patch
> pre-commit to use `uv` (which effectively `--with pre-commit-uv` does)
>
> That's another step of simplifying our dev env setup where existing
> tooling finally catches up with what we need and we can remove some of our
> custom
> (breeze) code that does it (which makes me super happy).
>
> More about it soon, when we get a new release of prefligit that will solve
> all the remaining (small) issues and have auto-complete merged (contributed
> by someone based on our issue  https://github.com/j178/prefligit/pull/380
> :).
>
> If there are any concerns or doubts - feel free to raise them :)
>
> J.
> ________________________________
>  Strike Technologies, LLC (“Strike”) is part of the GTS family of
> companies. Strike is a technology solutions provider, and is not a broker
> or dealer and does not transact any securities related business directly
> whatsoever. This communication is the property of Strike and its
> affiliates, and does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of
> an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction. It is intended only for
> the person to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is
> privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure.
> Distribution or copying of this communication, or the information contained
> herein, by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please immediately notify Strike
> at i...@striketechnologies.com, and delete and destroy any copies hereof.
> ________________________________
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY / PRIVILEGE NOTICE: This transmission and any attachments
> are intended solely for the addressee. This transmission is covered by the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C ''2510-2521. The
> information contained in this transmission is confidential in nature and
> protected from further use or disclosure under U.S. Pub. L. 106-102, 113
> U.S. Stat. 1338 (1999), and may be subject to attorney-client or other
> legal privilege. Your use or disclosure of this information for any purpose
> other than that intended by its transmittal is strictly prohibited, and may
> subject you to fines and/or penalties under federal and state law. If you
> are not the intended recipient of this transmission, please DESTROY ALL
> COPIES RECEIVED and confirm destruction to the sender via return
> transmittal.
>

Reply via email to