1 non-binding
-- Regards, Vishnu Chilukoori On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 8:12 AM Pavankumar Gopidesu <gopidesupa...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 non-binding > > Verified changes and triggered some examples all looks good. > > Pavan > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 12:12 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: > > > +1 (binding): > > * checked reproducibility > > * checked file list > > * checked installing in docker > > * checked signatures, licences, checksums > > > > All good! > > > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 1:08 PM Ankit Chaurasia <sunank...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 non-binding. I installed it using Breeze and tested my set of sample > > > example DAGs for standard and fab providers. > > > > > > *Ankit* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 2:17 PM Buğra Öztürk <ozturkbugr...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 non-binding > > > > > > > > Bugra Ozturk > > > > > > > > On Wed, 13 Aug 2025, 07:29 Amogh Desai, <amoghde...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 binding. > > > > > > > > > > Performed the following checks: > > > > > > > > > > * Checked SVN > > > > > * Checked in Docker > > > > > * Checked reproducible package builds > > > > > * Checked licenses > > > > > * Checked signatures > > > > > > > > > > I installed the bits with breeze and tested my set of simple > example > > > > dags, > > > > > mainly around the > > > > > standard provider. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > > Amogh Desai > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 1:38 AM Jens Scheffler > > > > <j_scheff...@gmx.de.invalid > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package > > > > build, > > > > > > Licenses, Signatures > > > > > > > > > > > > Tested standard+fab via breeze in Airflow 3.0.4 and integration > > test > > > > > > Dag, created a normal user. All looks good after a very > simplistic > > > > test. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12.08.25 12:19, Elad Kalif wrote: > > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This > > email > > > > is > > > > > > > calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - > > which > > > > > means > > > > > > > that it will end on August 15, 2025 10:15 AM UTC and until 3 > > > binding > > > > +1 > > > > > > > votes have been received. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Consider this my (binding) +1. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Airflow Providers are available at: > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary > > > > > > > Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for > > the > > > > > > Provider > > > > > > > distributions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary > > > > > > > Python "wheel" release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The test procedure for PMC members is described in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test > > this > > > > RC > > > > > is > > > > > > > described in: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Public keys are available at: > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the > > > community > > > > > are > > > > > > > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string. > > > > > > > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying > > > > > > > the artifact checksums when we actually release it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept > > here: > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/54398 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included > > in > > > > the > > > > > RC > > > > > > > candidates. > > > > > > > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the > > > > > > documentation > > > > > > > after the > > > > > > > RC candidates are released. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/2.4.1rc1/ > > > > > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-keycloak/0.0.1rc1/ > > > > > > > > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-standard/1.6.0rc2/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > Elad Kalif > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
