+1 binding.

- Checked SVN
- Checked in Docker
- Checked reproducible package builds
- Checked licenses
- Checked signatures

Didn't have any changes, so my tests are limited to the PMC checks.

Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai


On Fri, Oct 3, 2025 at 1:31 AM Elad Kalif <[email protected]> wrote:

> fab provider is excluded due to a bug found. it will have rc2.
> vote continues for Amazon provider
>
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 4:06 PM Elad Kalif <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Is it possible to include Edge3 and celery aswell as a part of this
> > release?
> >
> > No. it will have to wait for the next wave.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 2, 2025 at 1:14 AM Jens Scheffler <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package build,
> >> Licenses, Signatures
> >>
> >> Tested providers (but lagging Amazon subscription so mainly Fab). Tested
> >> with Airflow 3.0.6, 3.1.0 and latest main (LocalExecutor and
> >> EdgeExecutor) with Integration Test, via a seondary created user. All
> >> looks good. Tests executed via breeze.
> >>
> >> Note I saw a lot of messages like "2025-10-01T21:50:39.218718Z [warning
> >> ] appbuilder.app is deprecated and will be removed in a future version.
> >> Use current_app instead [flask_appbuilder.base]
> >> loc=init_appbuilder.py:228" in the console while starting, I assume some
> >> deprecations need to be cleaned? Non blocking to release in my view.
> >>
> >> On 01.10.25 11:07, Elad Kalif wrote:
> >> > Hey all,
> >> >
> >> > I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
> >> > calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours - which
> >> means
> >> > that it will end on October 04, 2025 09:05 AM UTC and until 3 binding
> +1
> >> > votes have been received.
> >> >
> >> > Consider this my (binding) +1.
> >> >
> >> > Airflow Providers are available at:
> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> >> >
> >> > *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> >> >   Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
> >> Provider
> >> > distributions.
> >> >
> >> > *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> >> >   Python "wheel" release.
> >> >
> >> > The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> >> >
> >> > The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC
> >> is
> >> > described in:
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Public keys are available at:
> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> >> >
> >> > Please vote accordingly:
> >> >
> >> > [ ] +1 approve
> >> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> >> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >> >
> >> > Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community
> >> are
> >> > encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> >> >
> >> > Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> >> > This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> >> > the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> >> >
> >> > The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> >> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/56284
> >> >
> >> > The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the
> >> RC
> >> > candidates.
> >> > Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> >> documentation
> >> > after the
> >> > RC candidates are released.
> >> >
> >> > You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> >> >
> >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.15.0rc1/
> >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-fab/3.0.0rc1/
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Elad Kalif
> >> >
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>
> >>
>

Reply via email to