Option C (binding)

On 22 Oct 2025, at 16:10, Josh Fell via dev <[email protected]> wrote:

+1 for option C (binding)

On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 9:39 PM Sumit Maheshwari <[email protected]>
wrote:

+1 for Option C (binding)
+0.5 for Option A (binding)

On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 6:32 AM Tzu-ping Chung via dev <
[email protected]> wrote:

My ideal scenario would be dag when we describe an object (using “a dag”
or “the dag” etc), and Dag as the class name, like any ordinary noun.

Since that would probably too much work for no real value (as many

already

suggested), I’m going to put +1 on option A since it matches best how my
mind wants to perceive the noun.

TP


On 21 Oct 2025, at 03:02, Constance Martineau via dev <

[email protected]> wrote:


Hi everyone,

As discussed in this email thread
<https://lists.apache.org/thread/h4b0vjfr4dkbyhrkoxpfjo67s38yr0hh>, I

am

formally calling a vote to finalize how we refer to Airflow workflows

in

writing. The vote will run for roughly 72 hours, and last until

Thursday

October 23rd at 7:00 pm UTC (countdown link
<https://countingdownto.com/?c=6656693>)

The options are:

 - Option A: Prefer dag in docs; use DAG only when referring to the
 class/import
 - Option B: Prefer Dag in docs; use DAG only for the class/import
 - Option C: Keep DAG as the standard everywhere (status quo)
 - Option D: Prefer Dag in docs, use Dag for class/import and alias

DAG

 (for backcompat reasons)

You can vote any fractional between -1 and +1 for any of the options,

and

the option with the highest sum (even if it's a negative) wins. This

is a

procedural vote, meaning that -1 is not considered a veto.  Everyone is
encouraged to vote, but only PMC members and Committer's votes are
considered binding.

Please see email thread
<https://lists.apache.org/thread/h4b0vjfr4dkbyhrkoxpfjo67s38yr0hh> for
additional context.

Why this matters: We’ve had inconsistent terminology across docs and
repeated PR debates over capitalization. Standardizing will make our
writing clearer, strengthen the Airflow brand, and give external
stakeholders a single reference to follow.

Best,
Constance



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to