+1 binding. Thanks everyone for bringing this together!

On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 1:54 PM Ankit Chaurasia <[email protected]> wrote:

> This proposal strikes the right balance between encouraging provider growth
> and keeping maintenance manageable for the community. The staged lifecycle
> of Incubation → Production → Attic/Deprecation, along with measurable
> criteria (PR volume, issue turnaround, contributor count, etc.), provides a
> clear path and accountability for providers.
>
> +1 non-binding.
> *Ankit Chaurasia*
> HomePage <https://ankitchaurasia.info/> |  LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/sunank200/> |  +91-9987351649
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 2:53 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1 binding.
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 2, 2025 at 9:55 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 binding.
> > >
> > > > On 2 Dec 2025, at 20:26, Jens Scheffler <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > Especially looking forward to broaden the community. I assume details
> > of
> > > processes and policies need to be refined when we learn over time. And
> I
> > am
> > > hoping we can keep a monorepo for the time being as splitting apart
> will
> > > add a big level of complexity in tooling in my view.
> > > >
> > > > On 12/2/25 00:09, Vikram Koka via dev wrote:
> > > >> Dear Airflowers,
> > > >>
> > > >>  Following up on the discussion thread regarding the "Updated
> Provider
> > > >> governance process", originally started on Sept 16th 2025 and
> > generally
> > > >> concluding last week, I would like to call for a vote.
> > > >>
> > > >> This is motivated by the incoming community requests for adding new
> > > >> providers (aka Integrations) to Apache Airflow, while updating the
> > > >> governance process to ensure maintainability without overloading the
> > > >> maintainers. This also leverages the model initially incorporated
> for
> > > the
> > > >> UI translations work.
> > > >>
> > > >> The actual proposal is documented on the wiki as an AIP and is
> linked
> > > >> below. This includes the comments, which I believed were important
> to
> > > keep
> > > >> as a reference.
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/%5BDRAFT%5D+AIP-95+Provider+lifecycle+update+proposal
> > > >>
> > > >> <
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/%5BDRAFT%5D+AIP-95+Provider+lifecycle+update+proposal
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> The vote will run for 5 days and last till Saturday, the 6th of
> > December
> > > >> 2025 23:10 UTC.
> > > >>
> > > >> Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only PMC members and
> > > Committer's
> > > >> votes are considered binding.
> > > >>
> > > >> Please regard this as my +1.
> > > >>
> > > >> Best regards,
> > > >> Vikram
> > > >> --
> > > >>
> > > >> Vikram Koka
> > > >> Chief Strategy Officer
> > > >> Email: [email protected]
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> <https://www.astronomer.io/>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >
> > >
> >
>


-- 
Bugra Ozturk

Reply via email to