Good catch! Strange to see that some of those providers need sqla for some feature of their own!
Thanks & Regards, Amogh Desai On Tue, Dec 30, 2025 at 1:19 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > While reviewing a hive PR I realized that some of our providers have an > implicit sqlalchemy dependency - I think all those providers do not have > sqlalchemy declared as one because currently sqlalchemy is provided by > "airflow-core" - but when we complete task isolation, task-sdk will not > have sqlalchemy as dependency, so those providers should have it declared - > most of them as optional "extra" dependency, some of them as "required" > (for the common.sql and related, sqlalchemy should be purely optional). > > I created issue https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/59895 -> as "good > first issue" and created sub-issues for each provider that uses sqlalchemy > now. > > Feel free to grab them. > > J. >
