Hey David,

Just read the AIP and posted questions on the Confluence page as well.

I find this very interesting and am *overall supportive*, but I have
several questions about usage and user / developer guidance.
Specifically around what we should be recommending around what user
situations. I put the following question in the confluence page as well:


   - You are making a strong case for supporting async within the
   PythonOperator pattern over Deferrable Operators.
   - What I am missing is when should users be using Deferrable Operators
   instead?
   - Also, are you advocating deprecating Deferrable Operators entirely? I
   am not opposed to it, but definitely something I am curious about your
   viewpoint here.


Until then, I would vote
-0.5 (binding)

I am absolutely willing and intend to change my vote, just want to get
questions answered first is all.

These are questions which any user would have and I therefore believe it is
important to address as part of making and merging this change.

Vikram



On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 9:14 AM Dheeraj Turaga <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Sriraj Dheeraj Turaga
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 9:19 AM Shahar Epstein <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 3:39 PM Blain David <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Everyone,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I would like to be calling a vote on this AIP:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-98%3A+Add+async+support+for+PythonOperator+in+Airflow+3
> > >
> > > There was already a discussion in the devlist regarding this proposal:
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/ztnfsqolow4v1zsv4pkpnxc1fk0hbf2p
> > >
> > > This AIP is already implemented and merged as a PR:
> > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/60268
> > >
> > > The vote will run for 5 days and last till next thursday, the 22th of
> Jan
> > > 2026 23:30 GMT.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Everyone is encouraged to vote, although only PMC members and
> Committers'
> > > votes are considered binding.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Please vote accordingly
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Approve
> > >
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I hereby already vote my +1 binding :)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > David aka dabla
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to