Personally I like it for major updates and features. ________________________________ From: Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2026 4:00 AM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: RE: [EXT] [DISCUSS] Do we still need the significant newsfragment check introduced in #44378?
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un expéditeur externe. Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jointe si vous ne pouvez pas confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si vous n’êtes pas certain que le contenu ne présente aucun risque. I think it's still quite useful On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 11:48 AM Wei Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > The significant newsfragment check was introduced in #44378 [1] mainly to > support the Airflow 2 to 3 migration and track breaking changes. (I thought > we only added significant newsfragments for breaking changes back then, but > Jed corrected me sometime after that.) > > Now that Airflow 3 is out, do we still need it? Or maybe we can just remove > it. > > Best, > Wei Lee > > [1] https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/44378 > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
