Dear Jarek, Thank you for the clarification. My assumption was that since the original scope received "looks good to me" (LGTM) comments and the current proposal is a subsection of that with no further objections, it was appropriate to proceed to the voting phase.
Updated AIP-85 has been available on Confluence for over 10 days, and I would like to initiate a focused discussion there. Given that this has been in the backlog for some time, do you have any recommendations on how to best progress this toward a resolution? Kind regards, Dilnaz Amanzholova On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 1:43 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > Generally lack of comments or even 'looks good' means that no-one had time > to look at it - and not that they have no objections. No objections > assumption is reserved for LAZY CONSENSUS when consensus seems to be > achieved > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2026, 13:40 Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > >> To be honest - I do not think there was enough of a discussion on it to >> start vote thread. And certainly not recently. No-one had any comments on >> it after scoping down and placing it in Confluence >> >> J. >> >> On Fri, Jun 5, 2026, 13:23 Dilnaz Amanzholova via dev < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I’m calling vote on AIP-85: DAG importer >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/_Q7OEg >>> >>> You can also review the design document here >>> < >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K6-4cGoZItXGQHZjOydNbc7rGtOp_XKfFurMnFptKe0/edit?tab=t.0 >>> > >>> . >>> >>> Current discussion thread (after scoping down): >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/wtfog0qjrf3oh7355db0x6mqk3o7l2dt >>> Original discussion thread (with wider "extendable DAG parsing controls" >>> title): https://lists.apache.org/thread/bn0oo47j48xh8r335gd2jrrjz0o7vnjl >>> >>> The vote will run for 5 days, closing on Wednesday, 10th June 2026, at >>> 10:00 UTC. >>> >>> Everyone is encouraged to vote, but only PMC members and Committers' >>> votes >>> are considered binding. Please vote accordingly. >>> >>> [ ] +1 Approve >>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Dilnaz Amanzholova >>> >>
