Hey all,

+1 (binding)
I have checked,
- SVN
- In Docker installation
- Reproducible package builds
- Licence
- Signature
- Checksums

Thanks for preparing the release Jarek!

Best Regards,
Bugra Ozturk

Op wo 10 jun 2026, 07:42 schreef Amogh Desai <[email protected]>:

> Installed the RC and performed the PMC checks along with testing
> some things in the spark provider.
>
> +1 binding.
>
> - Checked SVN
> - Checked reproducible package builds
> - Checked licences
> - Checked signatures
> - Checked SHA512 checks
>
> My tests passed for spark too, so we are good.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Amogh Desai
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 4:55 AM Niko Oliveira <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding) The Amazon changes were both verified manually and with a
> > system test run:
> >
> >
> https://aws-mwaa.github.io/#/open-source/system-tests/version/b183a4cb7b7e03f5ae596a3902313e9f17485ce1_9.30.0rc2.html
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 11:14 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey Jens, just to clarify: clickhousedb was published as *RC1* whereas
> > all
> > > the others were *RC2 *(not the other way round) :)
> > >
> > > Yep. That's part of the usual process. We added that option several
> > months
> > > ago when we started mixing RCs for various reasons. This is where even
> > the
> > > email template changed: previously, the template had an RCN number in
> the
> > > subject, but then we started to identify release waves by preparation
> > date,
> > > moved the providers we vote on to the "release preparation date" folder
> > and
> > > automated allowing the mixing of RCs :).
> > >
> > > We can even now run more than one provider's release wave
> simultaneously
> > if
> > > needed - identified by preparation date. We even have an escape hatch
> > > (2026-06-08_01 being the identifier). to allow two waves to be prepared
> > on
> > > the same date - but we've never need to use it.
> > >
> > > J.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 4:35 AM Wei Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (binding), checked:
> > > >
> > > > - SVN
> > > > - in Docker installation
> > > > - Reproducible build
> > > > - Licence
> > > > - Signature
> > > > - Checksums
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Wei Lee
> > > >
> > > > Aaron Chen <[email protected]> 於 2026年6月9日週二 上午5:50寫道:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Verified Spark 6.1.0rc2 with install/import smoke tests.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Aaron
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 1:48 PM Jens Scheffler <[email protected]
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Jarek,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > thanks for cutting the RC2!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (binding) - Checked SVN, Check in Docker, Reproducible package
> > > > build,
> > > > > > Licenses, Signatures
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Note: Had some challenges running my usual test procedure as I
> > failed
> > > > > > validation... until I noticed after some time that clickhousedb
> was
> > > > > > published as RC2 whereas all the others were RC1 - think my
> > approach
> > > is
> > > > > > not prepared to this. With manual adjustment all OK.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Did my usual test round with Edge Executor and Integration Test
> Dag
> > > in
> > > > > > Airflow 3.0.6, 3.1.8, 3.2.2 and on main and all looks good!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jens
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 08.06.26 20:22, Niko Oliveira wrote:
> > > > > > > Ahh, makes sense, thanks!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 11:04 AM Elad Kalif <[email protected]
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >>> Isn't this a follow-up release, meaning the voting period
> > should
> > > > only
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > >> 24
> > > > > > >> hours?
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Normally yes but Jarek added Clickhouse which was not part of
> > rc1
> > > so
> > > > > it
> > > > > > has
> > > > > > >> to be 72 hours.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 8:15 PM Niko Oliveira <
> > [email protected]
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> Thanks for the follow up release Jarek!
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end
> on
> > > > > > >> 2026-06-11
> > > > > > >>> 15:45 UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Isn't this a follow-up release, meaning the voting period
> > should
> > > > only
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > >> 24
> > > > > > >>> hours?
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> I will work on testing today.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> Cheers,
> > > > > > >>> Niko
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 10:11 AM Shahar Epstein <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>> +1 (binding), checked:
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> - SVN
> > > > > > >>>> - Checksums
> > > > > > >>>> - Signatures
> > > > > > >>>> - Licenses
> > > > > > >>>> - Reproducible build
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Shahar
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 6:45 PM Jarek Potiuk <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> Hey all,
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages
> with
> > > > > release
> > > > > > >>>>> preparation date 2026-06-08. This email is calling a vote
> on
> > > the
> > > > > > >>>>> release, which will last for 72 hours - which means that it
> > > will
> > > > > end
> > > > > > >>>>> on 2026-06-11 15:45 UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have
> > been
> > > > > > >>>>> received.
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> Consider this my (binding) +1.
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> This is a follow-up to the 2026-06-02 wave. It releases the
> > > four
> > > > > > >>>>> providers that were held back from that wave - amazon
> > (9.30.0),
> > > > > > >>>>> cncf.kubernetes (10.18.0), edge3 (3.8.0) and apache.spark
> > > > (6.1.0),
> > > > > > >> now
> > > > > > >>>>> re-cut as rc2 with the fixes they were waiting for - plus
> the
> > > > > > >>>>> brand-new ClickHouse provider (clickhousedb 1.0.0, rc1).
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> Airflow Providers are available at:
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/2026-06-08
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> *apache-airflow-providers-2026-06-08-source.tar.gz* is the
> > full
> > > > > > >> source
> > > > > > >>>>> tarball of airflow repo - snapshot taken at the moment of
> > > > > provider's
> > > > > > >>>>> release.
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the
> > > > convenience
> > > > > > >>>>> python "sdist" distributions that we publish in PyPI
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the
> > convenience
> > > > > Python
> > > > > > >>>>> "wheel" distributions that we publish in PyPI.
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> > > > > > >>>>> The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to
> > test
> > > > this
> > > > > > >> RC
> > > > > > >>>>> is described in:
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> > > > > > >>>>> Public keys are available at:
> > > > > > >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> Please vote accordingly:
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > > >>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > >>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the
> > > > > community
> > > > > > >>> are
> > > > > > >>>>> encouraged to test the release and vote with
> "(non-binding)".
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX'
> > string.
> > > > > > >>>>> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > > > > > >>>>> the artifact checksums when we actually release it.
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> The status of testing the providers by the community is
> kept
> > > > here:
> > > > > > >>>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/68225
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs
> > included
> > > > in
> > > > > > >> the
> > > > > > >>>>> RC candidates.
> > > > > > >>>>> Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in
> the
> > > > > > >>>>> documentation after the
> > > > > > >>>>> RC candidates are released.
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.30.0rc2/
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-spark/6.1.0rc2/
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-clickhousedb/1.0.0rc1/
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/10.18.0rc2/
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-edge3/3.8.0rc2/
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> Cheers,
> > > > > > >>>>> Jarek Potiuk
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [email protected]
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to