aah yes that would be it. Yes please, reply in the thread so all
conversation can stay in the same place. Otherwise there will be fragments
of same discussion in multiple emails and makes it difficult to follow both
now and even so in future.

On Mon, 15 Jun 2026 at 22:32, Sameer Mesiah <[email protected]> wrote:

> Is this fine? Personally, I am not sure why this is happening. I saw this
> post whilst browsing dev list on chrome and wanted to respond but I could
> not find the thread in my inbox. So I manually typed the thread title in
> the thread in the gmail subject line. Perhaps, that is the cause? I will
> avoid this next time.
>
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2026 at 22:18, Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Oh just saw, you had this problem earlier too :) -- Same reason as Jarek
> > pointed out on
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/dgw4m1q5rg8jvc170mnrrpdo3176cksx
> >
> > On Mon, 15 Jun 2026 at 22:16, Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> oh yeah, even on the archives:
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/9nfn40ybyspy9t6dchh2mrbm3z4pml3w
> doesn't
> >> show parent email like
> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/9f0btmsdjcsvzg8wv7wjo4r37xm30k7b for
> >> example.
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/5rpqpmh8ty9sf8bvg4zhxksr4w5tpkqj
> >> doesn't show the thread, weird.
> >>
> >> Not sure what happened there :shrug:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 15 Jun 2026 at 22:14, Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> aah my bad. For some reason, your email can as a separate email for me,
> >>> not threaded, so I was looking for it..
> >>>
> >>> [image: image.png]
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, 15 Jun 2026 at 22:04, Sameer Mesiah <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Kaxil,
> >>>>
> >>>> I believe it has been included in the opening post. But here it is
> >>>> again:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/66610
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, 15 Jun 2026 at 22:00, Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> > Hi Sameer, could you drop the PR link please?
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Sun, 14 Jun 2026 at 22:13, Sameer Mesiah <[email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > Hi Sean,
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > I think there could be a few more metadata fields that could be
> >>>> exposed
> >>>> > in
> >>>> > > the UI such as interval (both the value and source) as well as the
> >>>> > callback
> >>>> > > object class. Again, I would not say these are strictly required
> >>>> and we
> >>>> > > should be wary of information overload. I have left a more
> detailed
> >>>> > comment
> >>>> > > on the PR you linked.
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > Thanks,
> >>>> > > Sameer Mesiah.
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>
>

Reply via email to