Hi, With no further discussion, consensus reached
Thanks! Andrew and Teghveer On Tue, 21 Jul 2026 at 12:48, Jung-Hyun Andrew Kim < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a follow up to the discussion thread: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/l1b1wkxs69omjsb8cwdryr2oydjmn3yg > > To reiterate quickly, the /health endpoint does not reveal meaningful > information for distributed environments because it reports the system as > healthy if at least one of the following components is running and > heartbeating: the scheduler, DAG processor, or triggerer. This fails to > show meaningful status for distributed environments. > > Because discussion has mostly settled and the consensus is that Teghveer > and myselfs proposal is good to move forward I would like to call a lazy > consensus on the following design: > > Design Doc: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yWO-0YL6TNpABLwXoKy3YGVFZGnr4CE0Q1iZ_rpNmBo/edit?usp=sharing > > Example PR: https://github.com/JH-A-Kim/airflow-fork/pull/4 > > The Lazy consensus will be reached in 72 hours on July 24th 13:00 PST. > > Big thanks to Dennis, Vincent, and Niko for their feedback! > > Thanks, > > Andrew > >
