Glad to see the traction, thanks for weighing in everyone!

> Is this based on the Astronomer one?
https://github.com/astronomer/airflow-provider-duckdb

No code was based on that provider. It hasn't been updated in 3 years and
it focused on a minimal set of DuckDB features. There wasn't much to reuse
there.

On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 1:41 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:

> +10
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 8:40 AM Dev-iL <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Sounds good!
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Sept 2026, 9:04 Niko Oliveira, <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > I'd like to propose adding a new community provider for DuckDB.
> > >
> > > Integration overview:
> > > ---------------------
> > >
> > > DuckDB is an in-process analytical (OLAP) database. Unlike most SQL
> > > providers there is no server to connect to: queries run inside the task
> > > process, which makes it a cheap way to run an analytical transform that
> > > doesn't justify standing up a cluster. It reads and writes Parquet, CSV
> > and
> > > JSON directly from object storage, so it fits naturally between an
> > extract
> > > and a load step in a
> > > Dag.
> > >
> > > It also fits Airflow's existing shape well: The proposed DuckDB
> provider
> > > speaks DbAPI, so it plugs into the common-sql ecosystem rather than
> > needing
> > > new machinery, and it fits in the data-processing/ETL space. DuckDB
> Labs
> > > was acquired by Amazon but DuckDB remains MIT licensed and controlled
> by
> > > the DuckDB Foundation. It is usable with no account, no signup and no
> > > hosted service.
> > >
> > > The provider exposes a DuckDBHook extending DbApiHook, so it works with
> > > SQLExecuteQueryOperator and the rest of the common-sql ecosystem, plus
> a
> > > DuckDBExecuteQueryOperator and a duckdb connection type. The connection
> > is
> > > optional: with none configured the hook opens an in-memory database.
> > >
> > > Provider specific integrations would live in their relevant provider
> > > package (e.g. for AWS, an AwsDuckDBHook in
> > apache-airflow-providers-amazon
> > > for credential management).
> > >
> > > System tests:
> > > -------------
> > >
> > > DuckDB runs in-process with no live external service, so system tests
> are
> > > not
> > > required for this provider; the unit tests exercise a real in-memory
> > > DuckDB.
> > > An AWS-specific system test could be added in the Amazon provider
> > package,
> > > if folks think that's required.
> > >
> > > Proposed stewards:
> > > ------------------
> > >
> > > Myself and the AWS team plan to sponsor and steward this package, you
> > know
> > > us and our track record well :)
> > >
> > > - Niko Oliveira (@o-nikolas)
> > > - Vincent Beck (@vincbeck)
> > >
> > > Working implementation
> > > ----------------------
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/72845
> > >
> > > Incubation commitment
> > > ---------------------
> > >
> > > We commit to:
> > >
> > > - Maintaining the provider and responding to issues within a reasonable
> > > time
> > > - Meeting the incubation health metrics within 6 months
> > > - Participating in quarterly governance updates
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Niko
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to