Awesome! Somehow consistent and well integrated tools make quite a difference.
For first time or casual contributors it's annoying to create a JIRA account to create a single issue to get an ID to paste into the GH PR, then it can be unclear where to have the discussion. I hate to have to walkthrough teammates (new contributors) through this process. I understand why Gnu doesn't like GH, I get it, it's the philosophical principle at the root of Gnu that is incompatible with GH. But Apache choosing Atlassian is probably because that was the best option 5 or 10 years ago. Consistency across Apache projects is great, but consistency with the open source movement is more important to me. Max On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Jeremiah Lowin <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the heads up Chris! > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:21 AM Chris Riccomini <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > FYI- it sounds like there's some discussion about allowing GH issues > > instead of JIRA. > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: John D. Ament <[email protected]> > > Date: Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 7:17 AM > > Subject: Projects using GitHub issues > > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > > > > > All, > > > > I started a discussion on legal discuss, as I was told VP Legal approved > > using GitHub issues. I have no specific concerns, other than ensuring > that > > permissions are propagated. > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d2cb0eed30d72976a2f54893f132c1fe300a86d2fdbce1422763c9f0@%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E > > > > Its clear to me that legal-discuss isn't where this should start, so I'm > > not sure why VP Legal approved. Anyways, I wanted to get opinions from > the > > incubator on who should be discussing this issue. > > > > John > > >
