Somewhat related: Jira is down at the moment

I'm ready to send a PR just now and knowing that I can't create the JIRA
issue, I can't get an ID for it. And I know I won't be able to edit the
title of my GH PR later since I don't have admin rights in GH. Checkmate.

-----------------


​

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Maxime Beauchemin <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Awesome! Somehow consistent and well integrated tools make quite a
> difference.
>
> For first time or casual contributors it's annoying to create a JIRA
> account to create a single issue to get an ID to paste into the GH PR, then
> it can be unclear where to have the discussion. I hate to have to
> walkthrough teammates (new contributors) through this process.
>
> I understand why Gnu doesn't like GH, I get it, it's the philosophical
> principle at the root of Gnu that is incompatible with GH. But Apache
> choosing Atlassian is probably because that was the best option 5 or 10
> years ago. Consistency across Apache projects is great, but consistency
> with the open source movement is more important to me.
>
> Max
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Jeremiah Lowin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the heads up Chris!
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:21 AM Chris Riccomini <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > FYI- it sounds like there's some discussion about allowing GH issues
>> > instead of JIRA.
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: John D. Ament <[email protected]>
>> > Date: Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 7:17 AM
>> > Subject: Projects using GitHub issues
>> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> >
>> >
>> > All,
>> >
>> > I started a discussion on legal discuss, as I was told VP Legal approved
>> > using GitHub issues.  I have no specific concerns, other than ensuring
>> that
>> > permissions are propagated.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d2cb0eed30d72976a2f54893f132c1fe300a86d2fdbce1422763c9f0@%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E
>> >
>> > Its clear to me that legal-discuss isn't where this should start, so I'm
>> > not sure why VP Legal approved.  Anyways, I wanted to get opinions from
>> the
>> > incubator on who should be discussing this issue.
>> >
>> > John
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to