+1 from me. I don't think anyone feels Jira is better than GH Issues. What are next steps?
-s On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > What Github provides is basically the review board of Apache, but then a > lot better. > > > > > > Op 10 jun. 2016, om 17:51 heeft Chris Riccomini <[email protected]> > het volgende geschreven: > > > > Don't think a vote is required for this. Let's just let it sit for a day > or > > two to make sure everyone has had a chance to voice opinion, then do it. > > > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Maxime Beauchemin < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Should we vote on turning on the feature then? > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Chris Riccomini <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >> > >>>> Can it be added later and be synced from that point on? > >>> > >>> Yea, as soon as the PR is created, asfgit will start cross posting. > >>> > >>> Note: the posts look pretty nasty in JIRA, but if you just use it as an > >>> archival thing, then IMO it's OK. > >>> > >>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Maxime Beauchemin < > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Following up on this: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> I'd rather do as much as possible in one place. Github seems like a > >>> better > >>>> place since the code is a click away and comments in the code are very > >>>> valuable. > >>>> > >>>> What about issues where there are no PRs in place yet though? What > >>>> constitutes the link between the two systems, the "external issue > >> link"? > >>>> Can it be added later and be synced from that point on? > >>>> > >>>> Max > >>>> > >>> > >> > >
