Nice run down. There is also a security patch we need to integrate (also to 1.8.3).
Bolke Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad > Op 8 sep. 2017 om 11:31 heeft Ash Berlin-Taylor > <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven: > > There are a few PRs I would also like to see in this release, I've gone > through the open Github pull requests and picked some out. I've only listed > ones that I would accept if I was reviewing them. > > One of these two (one fixes the specific Celery setting I needed, the other > allows much more general customization of Celery config): > > - https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2572 > - https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2542 or > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2558 (both address the same > Jira in slightly different ways.) > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2578/files looks like it > might be an important fix for a change on master, though is lacking tests > covering the bug. > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2540 `Variable.setdefault` > raises an exception when the variable already exists(!), at least when using > JSON. > > > ### Two PRs that look good but aren't quite ready yet > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2327/files The > `--ignore_all_dependencies` flag wasn't working. (This seems to be failing > due to a missing license, but otherwise looks good and is an important fix. I > have asked the author to add the missing license to the new test file.) > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2531 Server-side paging of > DAGS - helps with large airflow instances. (Though this is currently marked > WIP, so I have asked the author for clarification on if this is ready or not) > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2562 - adding the 1.8.2 > changelog to master branch. > > > > ### And then some nice to haves/simple changes: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2532 Migrate the S3Hook to > use boto3. > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2509/files a tiny refactor > to move a calculation only to where it is needed. > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2479 fix syntax errors in > the docs > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2405 exposes a new option to > `airflow worker` for `--celery_hostname` to support running multiple workers > on the same node. > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2507/files - properly clears > hidden fields in the Connection UI when changing type. > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2237/files - Fix issue with > Gunicorn 19.4 and upgrade to it. Probably a good idea to not be stuck on > older versions of modules? (has conflicts, but its two one-line changes so > looks like it would be easy to resolve at merge time.) > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/2189/files - replace an > instance of hardcoded `scheduled_` prefix with ID_PREFIX variable. No > semantic meaning but seems to be the last instance of this string that isn't > using the variable. > > I hope this was helpful. > > -ash > > >> On 7 Sep 2017, at 20:26, Chris Riccomini <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Double negative for the win. Rephrase: Highly unlikely K8s will make 1.9.0. >> >> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Chris Riccomini <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Highly unlikely K8s will not make 1.9.0. >>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Depends on how fast it stabilizes... >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>>> On 7 Sep 2017, at 21:11, Sergei Iakhnin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The Kubernetes features would be exciting to have. Do you think these >>>> will >>>>> make it into this release? >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:22 PM Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Would be appreciated! >>>>>> >>>>>> Op 7 sep. 2017 8:06 p.m. schreef "Chris Riccomini" < >>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> : >>>>>> >>>>>>> @Bolke, I can wait to cut the test branch until that PR is merged, if >>>> you >>>>>>> like. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> One of my team members is preparing a comprehensive PR that reworks >>>> all >>>>>>>> logging to use the standard framework that was recently introduced. >>>> It >>>>>> is >>>>>>>> expected to be become public tomorrow. So please don't cut too early >>>>>> ;-). >>>>>>>> In addition it would be nice to have a PR clean up? Some PRs have >>>> been >>>>>>>> waiting for some time. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BTW: we will maintain 1.8.X for bug fixes until 1.10/2.0 comes >>>> along. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>> Bolke >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 7 Sep 2017, at 18:55, Chris Riccomini <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hey all, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The workflow is documented here: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Releasing+Airflow >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'll probably cut the 1.9.0 test branch today or tomorrow, depending >>>>>> on >>>>>>>>> schedule. I'll let folks know when it's cut via dev@. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Once the branch is cut does that mean no more PRs will be included >>>>>> in >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> release, or can some changes still be cherry-picked/merged in? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We can still cherry-pick PRs in. Very quickly, though, we begin >>>>>>> rejecting >>>>>>>>> any PRs that aren't bug fixes. It's a big exercise to stabilize >>>> these >>>>>>>>> releases, so I will start rejecting merging non-bug fix PRs pretty >>>>>>>> quickly. >>>>>>>>> Probably within a couple of weeks. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>> Chris >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Ash Berlin-Taylor < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What is the workflow? Once the branch is cut does that mean no more >>>>>>> PRs >>>>>>>>>> will be included in the release, or can some changes still be >>>>>>>>>> cherry-picked/merged in? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> (Is this documented somewhere I can read?) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Oh, and thing someone in gitter chat pointed out: the CHANGELOG on >>>>>>>> master >>>>>>>>>> doesn't include entries for 1.8.2. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -ash >>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Sep 2017, at 17:28, Andrew Chen <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Any estimate when branch 1.9 will be cut? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Maxime Beauchemin < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Go for it! Still trying to wrap up 1.8.2 ... >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Max >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Bolke de Bruin < >>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome! >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Sep 2017, at 17:04, Chris Riccomini < >>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey all, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want to get the ball rolling on 1.9.0, now that 1.8.2 is out >>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> door. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Max, I recall you mentioning driving this, but if you're burnt >>>>>>> out >>>>>>>>>>>> after >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 1.8.2 work, Joy and I can drive 1.9.0. Just let me know. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Sergei >>>> >>> >>> >
