The + is for local identifiers. Alpha is an official state. So it should be 1.9.0alpha0
Bolke Sent from my iPhone > On 13 Sep 2017, at 19:01, Chris Riccomini <[email protected]> wrote: > > > But do use alpha/beta please in your versioning for 1.9 for now please. > > 1.9.0alpha, or 1.9.0+alpha? The PEP is a little fuzzy to me. > >> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]> wrote: >> But do use alpha/beta please in your versioning for 1.9 for now please. >> >> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad >> >>> Op 13 sep. 2017 om 18:51 heeft Chris Riccomini <[email protected]> het >>> volgende geschreven: >>> >>> Hey all, >>> >>> I cut a 1.9.0 test branch: >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/tree/v1-9-test >>> >>> One question on versioning: should I switch the version in the branch to >>> 1.9.0, and bump the master version to 1.10.0dev0+incubating? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Chris >>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Chris Riccomini <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> Fantastic! I will cut a 1.9.0-test branch today! >>>> >>>>> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 7:40 AM, Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Small update: we are doing some quick iterations after some community >>>>> feedback (thanks @ash!) to make logging even more consistent. So, >>>>> perfectly fine to cut 1.9.0 but I hope you allow us to merge some things >>>>> in this area. >>>>> >>>>> Things we would like to fix: >>>>> >>>>> 1. Move from LoggingMixing().log() —> import logging log = >>>>> logging.getLogger(__name__) >>>>> 2. Move from logger.xx —> log.XX everywhere >>>>> 3. Maybe fix Dagprocessor logging >>>>> >>>>> Shouldn’t take us too long, but we probably touch a lot of files due to >>>>> some refactoring. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> Bolke >>>>> >>>>> > On 13 Sep 2017, at 10:18, Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > The PR has been merged. I hope you give 1.9.0 a bit of time to settle >>>>> > (Alpha, beta, …) , so we can give this logging refactor some love… >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >> On 11 Sep 2017, at 22:59, Chris Riccomini <[email protected]> >>>>> >> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I'm waiting to cut 1.9.0 test until this lands. Can you please post >>>>> >> here >>>>> >> when it is committed? >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]> >>>>> >> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >>> Small update: I expect the logging update to come in either today or >>>>> >>> tomorrow (Monday). Due to its nature - refactoring all logging - it >>>>> >>> will be >>>>> >>> massive. This is unfortunately unavoidable. Still I think it is the >>>>> >>> right >>>>> >>> thing to do for 1.9.0 otherwise it needs to wait another major release >>>>> >>> probably. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Bolke >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>> Op 7 sep. 2017 om 21:26 heeft Chris Riccomini <[email protected]> >>>>> >>> het volgende geschreven: >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> Double negative for the win. Rephrase: Highly unlikely K8s will make >>>>> >>> 1.9.0. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Chris Riccomini >>>>> >>>> <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Highly unlikely K8s will not make 1.9.0. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]> >>>>> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Depends on how fast it stabilizes... >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> On 7 Sep 2017, at 21:11, Sergei Iakhnin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> The Kubernetes features would be exciting to have. Do you think >>>>> >>>>>>> these >>>>> >>>>>> will >>>>> >>>>>>> make it into this release? >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:22 PM Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> Would be appreciated! >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> Op 7 sep. 2017 8:06 p.m. schreef "Chris Riccomini" < >>>>> >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>>>>>> : >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> @Bolke, I can wait to cut the test branch until that PR is >>>>> >>>>>>>>> merged, >>>>> >>> if >>>>> >>>>>> you >>>>> >>>>>>>>> like. >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Bolke de Bruin >>>>> >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> One of my team members is preparing a comprehensive PR that >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> reworks >>>>> >>>>>> all >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> logging to use the standard framework that was recently >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> introduced. >>>>> >>>>>> It >>>>> >>>>>>>> is >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> expected to be become public tomorrow. So please don't cut too >>>>> >>> early >>>>> >>>>>>>> ;-). >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In addition it would be nice to have a PR clean up? Some PRs >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> have >>>>> >>>>>> been >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> waiting for some time. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> BTW: we will maintain 1.8.X for bug fixes until 1.10/2.0 comes >>>>> >>>>>> along. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Bolke >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Sep 2017, at 18:55, Chris Riccomini >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hey all, >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> The workflow is documented here: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/ >>>>> >>> Releasing+Airflow >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'll probably cut the 1.9.0 test branch today or tomorrow, >>>>> >>> depending >>>>> >>>>>>>> on >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> schedule. I'll let folks know when it's cut via dev@. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Once the branch is cut does that mean no more PRs will be >>>>> >>> included >>>>> >>>>>>>> in >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> release, or can some changes still be cherry-picked/merged in? >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> We can still cherry-pick PRs in. Very quickly, though, we >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> begin >>>>> >>>>>>>>> rejecting >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> any PRs that aren't bug fixes. It's a big exercise to >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> stabilize >>>>> >>>>>> these >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> releases, so I will start rejecting merging non-bug fix PRs >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> pretty >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> quickly. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Probably within a couple of weeks. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Chris >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Ash Berlin-Taylor < >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What is the workflow? Once the branch is cut does that mean >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> no >>>>> >>> more >>>>> >>>>>>>>> PRs >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> will be included in the release, or can some changes still be >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> cherry-picked/merged in? >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> (Is this documented somewhere I can read?) >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, and thing someone in gitter chat pointed out: the >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> CHANGELOG >>>>> >>> on >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> master >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't include entries for 1.8.2. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -ash >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Sep 2017, at 17:28, Andrew Chen >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Any estimate when branch 1.9 will be cut? >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Maxime Beauchemin < >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Go for it! Still trying to wrap up 1.8.2 ... >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Max >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Bolke de Bruin < >>>>> >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Awesome! >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Sep 2017, at 17:04, Chris Riccomini < >>>>> >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey all, >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I want to get the ball rolling on 1.9.0, now that 1.8.2 >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>> >>> out >>>>> >>>>>>>> the >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> door. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Max, I recall you mentioning driving this, but if you're >>>>> >>> burnt >>>>> >>>>>>>>> out >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> after >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 1.8.2 work, Joy and I can drive 1.9.0. Just let me >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know. >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Chris >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> Sergei >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>> >>> >
