Are you sure you want to go ahead and do RCs right away? Isn’t a beta a bit smarter?
- Bolke > On 20 Sep 2017, at 19:41, Chris Riccomini <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey all, > > I want to send out a warning that I'm planning to cut the stable branch > next week, and begin the RC1 release vote. Once the stable branch is cut, I > will be locking down what commits get cherry picked into the branch, and > will only be doing PRs that are required to get the release out. > > Cheers, > Chris > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Chris Riccomini <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >> An update on the 1.9.0 release. Here are the outstanding PRs that are >> slated to be included into 1.9.0: >> >> ISSUE ID |STATUS |DESCRIPTION >> AIRFLOW-1617 |Open |XSS Vulnerability in Variable endpoint >> AIRFLOW-1611 |Open |Customize logging in Airflow >> AIRFLOW-1605 |Reopened |Fix log source of local loggers >> AIRFLOW-1604 |Open |Rename the logger to log >> AIRFLOW-1525 |Open |Fix minor LICENSE & NOTICE issue >> AIRFLOW-1499 |In Progres|Eliminate duplicate and unneeded code >> AIRFLOW-1198 |Open |HDFSOperator to operate HDFS >> AIRFLOW-1055 |Open |airflow/jobs.py:create_dag_run() exception for >> @on >> AIRFLOW-1019 |Open |active_dagruns shouldn't include paused DAGs >> AIRFLOW-1018 |Open |Scheduler DAG processes can not log to stdout >> AIRFLOW-1015 |Open |TreeView displayed over task instances >> AIRFLOW-1013 |Open |airflow/jobs.py:manage_slas() exception for >> @once >> AIRFLOW-976 |Open |Mark success running task causes it to fail >> AIRFLOW-914 |Open |Refactor BackfillJobTest.test_backfill_examples >> to >> AIRFLOW-913 |Open |Refactor tests.CoreTest.test_scheduler_job to >> real >> AIRFLOW-912 |Open |Refactor tests and build matrix >> AIRFLOW-888 |Open |Operators should not push XComs by default >> AIRFLOW-828 |Open |Add maximum size for XComs >> AIRFLOW-825 |Open |Add Dataflow semantics >> AIRFLOW-788 |Open |Context unexpectedly added to hive conf >> >> I will be locking down what can get cherry-picked into the 1.9.0 branch >> shortly, so if you have something you want in, please set the fix version >> to 1.9.0. >> >> We (at WePay) have deployed 1.9.0 into our dev cluster, and it has been >> running smoothly for several days. >> >> ** I could really use help verifying stability. If you run Airflow, it's >> in your best interest to deploy the 1.9.0 test branch somewhere, and verify >> it's working for your workload. ** >> >> Cheers, >> Chris >>
