I can do a beta. Is the process significantly different? IIRC, it's basically the same, just no vote, right?
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]> wrote: > Are you sure you want to go ahead and do RCs right away? Isn’t a beta a > bit smarter? > > - Bolke > > > On 20 Sep 2017, at 19:41, Chris Riccomini <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > I want to send out a warning that I'm planning to cut the stable branch > > next week, and begin the RC1 release vote. Once the stable branch is > cut, I > > will be locking down what commits get cherry picked into the branch, and > > will only be doing PRs that are required to get the release out. > > > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Chris Riccomini <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > >> Hey all, > >> > >> An update on the 1.9.0 release. Here are the outstanding PRs that are > >> slated to be included into 1.9.0: > >> > >> ISSUE ID |STATUS |DESCRIPTION > >> AIRFLOW-1617 |Open |XSS Vulnerability in Variable endpoint > >> AIRFLOW-1611 |Open |Customize logging in Airflow > >> AIRFLOW-1605 |Reopened |Fix log source of local loggers > >> AIRFLOW-1604 |Open |Rename the logger to log > >> AIRFLOW-1525 |Open |Fix minor LICENSE & NOTICE issue > >> AIRFLOW-1499 |In Progres|Eliminate duplicate and unneeded code > >> AIRFLOW-1198 |Open |HDFSOperator to operate HDFS > >> AIRFLOW-1055 |Open |airflow/jobs.py:create_dag_run() exception for > >> @on > >> AIRFLOW-1019 |Open |active_dagruns shouldn't include paused DAGs > >> AIRFLOW-1018 |Open |Scheduler DAG processes can not log to stdout > >> AIRFLOW-1015 |Open |TreeView displayed over task instances > >> AIRFLOW-1013 |Open |airflow/jobs.py:manage_slas() exception for > >> @once > >> AIRFLOW-976 |Open |Mark success running task causes it to fail > >> AIRFLOW-914 |Open |Refactor BackfillJobTest.test_backfill_ > examples > >> to > >> AIRFLOW-913 |Open |Refactor tests.CoreTest.test_scheduler_job to > >> real > >> AIRFLOW-912 |Open |Refactor tests and build matrix > >> AIRFLOW-888 |Open |Operators should not push XComs by default > >> AIRFLOW-828 |Open |Add maximum size for XComs > >> AIRFLOW-825 |Open |Add Dataflow semantics > >> AIRFLOW-788 |Open |Context unexpectedly added to hive conf > >> > >> I will be locking down what can get cherry-picked into the 1.9.0 branch > >> shortly, so if you have something you want in, please set the fix > version > >> to 1.9.0. > >> > >> We (at WePay) have deployed 1.9.0 into our dev cluster, and it has been > >> running smoothly for several days. > >> > >> ** I could really use help verifying stability. If you run Airflow, it's > >> in your best interest to deploy the 1.9.0 test branch somewhere, and > verify > >> it's working for your workload. ** > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Chris > >> > >
