Can we make that 2.0? Ie. skip 1.10? With the many changes that are scheduled: new web ui, time zone support I think it would make sense. Maybe we should move some api stuff out of experimental as well.
B. Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad > Op 13 dec. 2017 om 20:14 heeft Chris Riccomini <[email protected]> het > volgende geschreven: > > Hey Vincent, > >> When you say "we're going to be moving over to it", do you mean that it's > in the official roadmap? > > Yes. We first discussed RBAC back in August: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/31bbf40f256bc469e578aa4098d631e9aa3e644bf555309e3729bcfc@%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E > > We then had a meeting to discuss the work, which was advertised in the dev@ > mailing list. > > Since then, Joy Gao has been working on updating the webserver: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a95c0c307d68d2a5196705987b3d80788882e74b4106908da8bff83c@%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E > > And has presented on the topic at the last SF bay area Airflow meetup. > > The plan is to merge this webserver into master before 1.10 is released > (i.e. in the next month or two). From there we would eventually deprecate > and remove the legacy UI. > > Cheers, > Chris > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Rafael Gomes <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> If we have an official roadmap I would like to help. >> >> On Dec 13, 2017 1:13 PM, "[email protected]" < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Chris, >>> >>> Thanks for the link, really nice. >>> When you say "we're going to be moving over to it", do you mean that it's >>> in the official roadmap? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Vincent >>> >>>> On 2017-12-12 17:53, Chris Riccomini <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> (Note, FAB = https://github.com/dpgaspar/Flask-AppBuilder) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Chris Riccomini < >> [email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> If you are looking at implementing this, I'd suggest looking at FAB >> and >>>>> https://github.com/wepay/airflow-webserver. FAB has a much cleaner >>>>> security model than the current UI, and we're going to be moving over >>> to >>>>> it. If FAB doesn't support SAML 2.0 (I don't think it does), I think >>>>> patching it to do so would be a way to get what you want. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Gerard Toonstra < >> [email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> Has anyone looked at / implemented /disconsidered saml2.0 >>> authentication >>>>>> for airflow? Did a search on google, but this didn't return >> anything >>>>>> specific. >>>>>> >>>>>> Rgds, >>>>>> >>>>>> Gerard >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
