Yes, and deprecate the things that have been logging.warn for a while. Max
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 1:19 PM, Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]> wrote: > Can we make that 2.0? Ie. skip 1.10? With the many changes that are > scheduled: new web ui, time zone support I think it would make sense. Maybe > we should move some api stuff out of experimental as well. > > B. > > Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad > > > Op 13 dec. 2017 om 20:14 heeft Chris Riccomini <[email protected]> > het volgende geschreven: > > > > Hey Vincent, > > > >> When you say "we're going to be moving over to it", do you mean that > it's > > in the official roadmap? > > > > Yes. We first discussed RBAC back in August: > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/31bbf40f256bc469e578aa4098d631 > e9aa3e644bf555309e3729bcfc@%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E > > > > We then had a meeting to discuss the work, which was advertised in the > dev@ > > mailing list. > > > > Since then, Joy Gao has been working on updating the webserver: > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/a95c0c307d68d2a5196705987b3d80 > 788882e74b4106908da8bff83c@%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E > > > > And has presented on the topic at the last SF bay area Airflow meetup. > > > > The plan is to merge this webserver into master before 1.10 is released > > (i.e. in the next month or two). From there we would eventually deprecate > > and remove the legacy UI. > > > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Rafael Gomes <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> If we have an official roadmap I would like to help. > >> > >> On Dec 13, 2017 1:13 PM, "[email protected]" < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Chris, > >>> > >>> Thanks for the link, really nice. > >>> When you say "we're going to be moving over to it", do you mean that > it's > >>> in the official roadmap? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Vincent > >>> > >>>> On 2017-12-12 17:53, Chris Riccomini <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> (Note, FAB = https://github.com/dpgaspar/Flask-AppBuilder) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 8:52 AM, Chris Riccomini < > >> [email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> If you are looking at implementing this, I'd suggest looking at FAB > >> and > >>>>> https://github.com/wepay/airflow-webserver. FAB has a much cleaner > >>>>> security model than the current UI, and we're going to be moving over > >>> to > >>>>> it. If FAB doesn't support SAML 2.0 (I don't think it does), I think > >>>>> patching it to do so would be a way to get what you want. > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 6:35 AM, Gerard Toonstra < > >> [email protected]> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hello, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Has anyone looked at / implemented /disconsidered saml2.0 > >>> authentication > >>>>>> for airflow? Did a search on google, but this didn't return > >> anything > >>>>>> specific. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Rgds, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Gerard > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> >
