This is now fixed in master. Clearing tasks will now properly terminate a running task. If you pause the dag run no new tasks will be scheduled.
B. Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad > Op 12 apr. 2018 om 20:23 heeft Laura Lorenz <llor...@industrydive.com> het > volgende geschreven: > > That won't stop them if they are already running in a celery worker or > already in your messaging queue backend (e.g. rabbitmq; redis), but it will > prevent the message to do them from being emitted again by the airflow > scheduler to your messaging queue backend. To be thorough you have to do > both - stop the scheduler from scheduling the tasks anymore (by failing > them individually and/or the DagRun in the metadata database) and, if you > want to make sure the tasks that already got picked up stop and don't try > again, you have to kill their worker processes and make sure your messaging > queue is clean of messages of that task type. If you don't care that any > already started or queued up tasks finish, you can simply doctor the > metadata database. > > Laura > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:40 PM, ramandu...@gmail.com <ramandu...@gmail.com >> wrote: > >> Thanks Laura, >> We are using the CeleryExecutor. Just wondering if marking the >> TaskInstances as failed in metadata store would also work. >> -Raman >> >>> On 2018/04/12 16:27:00, Laura Lorenz <llor...@industrydive.com> wrote: >>> I use the CeleryExecutor and have used a mix of `celery control` and >>> messaging queue purges to kill the running tasks and prevent them from >>> being picked up by workers again (respectively), and doctor the DagRun to >>> failed to stop the scheduler from repopulating the message. I think if >> you >>> are using the Local or Sequential Executor you'd have to kill the >> scheduler >>> process. >>> >>> Laura >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 12:05 PM, Taylor Edmiston <tedmis...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I don't think killing a currently running task is possible today. >>>> >>>> Of course you can pause it from the CLI or web UI so that future runs >> don't >>>> get triggered, but it sounds like that's not what you're looking for. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Taylor >>>> >>>> *Taylor Edmiston* >>>> Blog <http://blog.tedmiston.com> | Stack Overflow CV >>>> <https://stackoverflow.com/story/taylor> | LinkedIn >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/tedmiston/> | AngelList >>>> <https://angel.co/taylor> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:26 AM, ramandu...@gmail.com < >>>> ramandu...@gmail.com >>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> We have a use case to cancel the already running DAG. So is there any >>>>> recommended way to do so. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Raman >>>>> >>>> >>> >>