I know I'm nitpicking but afaik you need 3 +1s to make the change. However why dont you open a slack Channel and see who joins and let people know on gitter as well that it exists?
B. Op zo 9 sep. 2018 08:15 schreef Sid Anand <san...@apache.org>: > Taking Binding votes into account : > > +1: 1 vote > > - Sid Anand > > 0: 2 votes > > - Bolke de Bruin > - Kaxil Naik > > -0.5: 1 vote > > - Arthur Wiedmer > > > Vote result is a net positive of +0.5. > > I counted all of the PMC/committers' votes as binding. > > -s > > On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 11:07 PM Arthur Wiedmer <arthur.wied...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Sid, > > > > Erm, the next line is (emphasis mine) : > > > > PMC members have formally binding votes, but in general community members > > are encouraged to vote, even if their votes are *only advisory*. > > > > Again, that's not to say that the community at large cannot decide to > host > > a Slack channel. I think you are more than welcome to if you want to. > > > > Best, > > Arthur > > > > On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 10:59 PM Sid Anand <san...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > Why doesn't every vote matter for this topic? > > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#binding-votes > > > > > > Am I misinterpreting the "Who is permitted to vote is, to some extent, > a > > > community-specific thing."? > > > > > > For the established Apache processes around promoting a contributor to > > > committer/PMC, deciding on the number of +1s to allow a merge to > master, > > or > > > voting on releases, I understand the need to follow the > > binding/non-binding > > > protocol. In all of those cases, the outcomes affect maintainers. > > > > > > My understanding is that this topic affects the entire community, where > > > some members of the community are helping others. This seems to chug > > along > > > without maintainers being present. Hence, why do maintainers' votes > > matter > > > more here? > > > > > > Question for the mentors.. Jakob? > > > > > > -s > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 8, 2018 at 10:27 PM Bolke de Bruin <bdbr...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Committers can only vote binding. Most of the time it is tagged by, > > > > indeed, adding "binding" to the vote. > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > > > > > On 9 Sep 2018, at 07:20, Scott Halgrim <scott.halg...@zapier.com > > > .INVALID> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > What makes a vote binding? Just putting “(binding)” after your > vote? > > > > >> On Sep 8, 2018, 10:19 PM -0700, Bolke de Bruin <bdbr...@gmail.com > >, > > > > wrote: > > > > >> Sorry sid, only binding votes directly count to the vote. Please > > > update > > > > the > > > > >> result accordingly. > > > > >> > > > > >> Btw did you ask on gitter itself? > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> Op zo 9 sep. 2018 03:47 schreef Sid Anand <san...@apache.org>: > > > > >> > > > > >>> +1: 12 votes > > > > >>> > > > > >>> - Sid Anand > > > > >>> - Steve Carpenter > > > > >>> - Beau Barker > > > > >>> - Marc Bollinger > > > > >>> - Pedro Machado > > > > >>> - Scott Halgrim > > > > >>> - Eamon Keane > > > > >>> - Adam Boscarino > > > > >>> - Daniel Cohen > > > > >>> - Chandu Kavar > > > > >>> - William Horton > > > > >>> - Ben Gregory > > > > >>> > > > > >>> 0: 2 votes > > > > >>> > > > > >>> - Bolke de Bruin > > > > >>> - Kaxil Naik > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> -0.5: 1 vote > > > > >>> > > > > >>> - Arthur Wiedmer > > > > >>> > > > > >>> -1: 4 votes > > > > >>> > > > > >>> - Shah Altaf > > > > >>> - James Meickle > > > > >>> - Ravi Kotecha > > > > >>> - airflowuser (??) > > > > >>> > > > > >>> The vote concludes with 12 votes for and 4.5 votes against. The > > > > community > > > > >>> has opted to move to Slack from Gitter. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> -s > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > >
