Hi, kaczors on gitter has produced a minmal reproduction case: https://github.com/kaczors/airflow_1_10_tz_bug
Rough repro steps: In a VM, with time syncing disabled, and configured with system timezone of Europe/Zurich (or any other CEST one) run - `date 10280250.00` - initdb, start scheduler, webserver, enable dag etc. - `date 10280259.00` - wait 5-10 mins for scheduler to catch up - After the on-the-hour task run the scheduler will spin up another process to parse the dag... and it never returns. I've only just managed to reproduce it, so haven't dug in to why yet. A quick hacky debug print shows something is stuck in an infinite loop. -ash > On 29 Oct 2018, at 17:59, Bolke de Bruin <bdbr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Can this be confirmed? Then I can have a look at it. Preferably with dag > definition code. > > On the licensing requirements: > > 1. Indeed licensing header for markdown documents. It was suggested to use > html comments. I’m not sure how that renders with others like PDF though. > 2. The licensing notifications need to be tied to a specific version as > licenses might change with versions. > > Cheers > Bolke > > Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad > >> Op 29 okt. 2018 om 12:39 heeft Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org> het >> volgende geschreven: >> >> I was going to make a start on the release, but two people have reported >> that there might be an issue around non-UTC dags and the scheduler changing >> over from Summer time. >> >>> 08:45 Emmanuel> Hi there, we are currently experiencing a very strange >>> issue : we have hourly DAGs with a start_date in a local timezone (not UTC) >>> and since (Sunday) the last winter time change they don’t run anymore. Any >>> idea ? >>> 09:41 <Emmanuel> it impacted all our DAG that had a run at 3am >>> (Europe/Paris), the exact time of winter time change :( >> >> I am going to take a look at this today and see if I can get to the bottom >> of it. >> >> Bolke: are there any outstanding tasks/issues that you know of that might >> slow down the vote for a 1.10.1? (i.e. did we sort of out all the licensing >> issues that were asked of us? I thought I read something about license >> declarations in markdown files?) >> >> -ash >> >>> On 28 Oct 2018, at 14:46, Bolke de Bruin <bdbr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I agree with that, but I would favor time based releases instead. We are >>> again at the point that a release takes so much time that the gap is >>> getting really big again. @ash why not start releasing now and move the >>> remainder to 1.10.2? I dont think there are real blockers (although we >>> might find them). >>> >>> >>>> On 28 Oct 2018, at 15:35, airflowuser <airflowu...@protonmail.com.INVALID> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I was really hoping that >>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/pull/4069 will be merged into >>>> 1.10.1 >>>> Deleting dags was a highly requested feature for 1.10 - this can fix the >>>> problem with it. >>>> >>>> >>>> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >>>>>> On Friday, October 26, 2018 6:12 PM, Bolke de Bruin <bdbr...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hey Ash, >>>>> >>>>> I was wondering if you are picking up the 1.10.1 release? Master is >>>>> speeding ahead and you were tracking fixes for 1.10.1 right? >>>>> >>>>> B. >>
