-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21559/#review43251
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Sid Wagle


On May 16, 2014, 5:40 p.m., John Speidel wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/21559/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 16, 2014, 5:40 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari and Sid Wagle.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-5793
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-5793
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> There are two issues here.
> Due to an earlier jira, nagios_web_password had a hard coded default since it 
> wasn't yet specified in the stack.
> If multiple passwords are required in different configurations for the same 
> host group, not all missing passwords are reported to the user.
> 
> For the first issue the solution is to simply not provide a default value for 
> the nagios_web_password.
> For the second issue, needed to fix code that added missing properties to map 
> so that they aren't overridden.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/internal/ClusterResourceProvider.java
>  8b6c39a 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/orm/entities/BlueprintEntity.java
>  cd764ec 
>   
> ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/internal/ClusterResourceProviderTest.java
>  f8bb351 
>   
> ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/orm/entities/BlueprintEntityTest.java
>  cff9aad 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21559/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Unit Tests:
> - added unit tests for this scenario
> Ran all unit tests but ran into one previously known issue.
> Waiting for this issue to be resolved.
> 
> Functional Tests:
> Performed manual functional testing of this scenario.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> John Speidel
> 
>

Reply via email to