I found this URL that works on my browser! This is an essential progress of sorts for this project. https://thelanguagenerds.com/2019/piraha-language-the-linguistic-anomaly/#:~:text=two%20experiments%20on-,four,-Pirah%C3%A3%20speakers%20that
Dont know how this URL was generated. If this is a standard we can use (any links?) thanks for any pointers. -dinesh On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 7:39 PM Gerben <ger...@treora.com.invalid> wrote: > Hi Udit, glad to hear you are interested in Web Annotation and > Annotator. Sounds like you did some serious research! > > Development of Apache Annotator has indeed slowed, mainly due to lack of > time from the initial developers, to an activity level that could well > be called hybernation.. However, it may merely need a motivated person > to wake it up again. Contributions are certainly welcome. > > We can jump on a call some day if you are interested. I see you already > joined the chatroom (#annotator on libera.chat), so let’s coordinate > over there. > > Answers to your questions below, inline. > > Kind regards, > — Gerben > > On 18/04/2023 01:40, Udit Desai wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I recently stumbled upon the Apache Annotator project while researching > on W3C > > Web Annotation spec<https://www.w3.org/annotation/> and its > > implementations. > > > > I tried to gather all the information I could on this project (Mail list, > > Github, IRC etc.). But all those channels seemed silent and did not give > > clear indication on whether this project is under active development or > > not. Is it? > > > > If so, I have further questions: > > > > - Does this project have any real world examples where it is being > used > > in any large scale system in a production environment? > > Not that I know of, but (parts of) it might be. Note that the project > provides a library of quite simple functions — it’s not an all-in-one > framework like its predecessor AnnotatorJS <https://annotatorjs.org/> > is/was. People could just use e.g. its text highlighter function and > ignore any of the other functionality. > > > - The latest published version on npm is 0.2.0, which makes me > believe > > that the APIs have not reached a stable milestone. Is that a fair > > assumption? > We’ve indeed been open to the idea of tweaking the API still. I think it > is needlessly complicated now for simple uses cases. A good first step > would be making synchronous API and non-curried functions. (see e.g. > issue #81 <https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/issues/81>, > #115 <https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/issues/115>) > > - What would it take to bring the project to version 1.0? > > A version bump, I guess. ;) > > It’s largely a matter of taste when to call something ‘1.0’. Given the > low activity and limited functionality it provides, I would still keep > it at a version <1 to convey this immaturity. (Also, being an incubating > Apache project, perhaps an eventual graduation would be a nice moment to > call it 1.0). > > > - Are you open to receive contributions on this, of course with some > > guidance from your team? > Yes, as said above. People may however not have a lot of time for > guidance.. > > - The last dev call was probably last year in April 2022. Are they > > happening anymore anywhere else or just haven't happened since then? > That could have been the last dev call indeed.. > > > > Regards, > > Udit Desai > > Mobile: +61-459-343-918 > >
