Nice. Thanks.

How to create them? :)
Did you hand write the urls?

On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 1:01 PM Gerben <ger...@treora.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Dinesh! It’s called “URL Fragment Text Directives” these days (for a
> while it was called “Text Fragments”, originally
> “scroll-to-text-fragment”). The Chromium/Chrome team started this a few
> years ago. Other browsers started to follow up, as that happens more
> often.. (in this case, I think it is a helpful development for the web)
>
> Draft Specification: https://wicg.github.io/scroll-to-text-fragment/
> Browser support: https://caniuse.com/url-scroll-to-text-fragment
>
> By the way, I made a line-by-line implementation of the spec, but it’s
> somewhat outdated now: <https://code.treora.com/gerben/text-fragments-ts>.
>
> Cheers,
> — Gerben
>
> On 02/05/2023 06:35, TB Dinesh wrote:
> > I found this URL that works on my browser! This is an essential progress of
> > sorts for this project.
> > https://thelanguagenerds.com/2019/piraha-language-the-linguistic-anomaly/#:~:text=two%20experiments%20on-,four,-Pirah%C3%A3%20speakers%20that
> >
> > Dont know how this URL was generated.
> > If this is a standard we can use (any links?)
> >
> > thanks for any pointers.
> >
> > -dinesh
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 7:39 PM Gerben <ger...@treora.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Udit, glad to hear you are interested in Web Annotation and
> >> Annotator. Sounds like you did some serious research!
> >>
> >> Development of Apache Annotator has indeed slowed, mainly due to lack of
> >> time from the initial developers, to an activity level that could well
> >> be called hybernation.. However, it may merely need a motivated person
> >> to wake it up again. Contributions are certainly welcome.
> >>
> >> We can jump on a call some day if you are interested. I see you already
> >> joined the chatroom (#annotator on libera.chat), so let’s coordinate
> >> over there.
> >>
> >> Answers to your questions below, inline.
> >>
> >> Kind regards,
> >> — Gerben
> >>
> >> On 18/04/2023 01:40, Udit Desai wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I recently stumbled upon the Apache Annotator project while researching
> >> on W3C
> >>> Web Annotation spec<https://www.w3.org/annotation/>  and its
> >>> implementations.
> >>>
> >>> I tried to gather all the information I could on this project (Mail list,
> >>> Github, IRC etc.). But all those channels seemed silent and did not give
> >>> clear indication on whether this project is under active development or
> >>> not. Is it?
> >>>
> >>> If so, I have further questions:
> >>>
> >>>      - Does this project have any real world examples where it is being
> >> used
> >>>      in any large scale system in a production environment?
> >> Not that I know of, but (parts of) it might be. Note that the project
> >> provides a library of quite simple functions — it’s not an all-in-one
> >> framework like its predecessor AnnotatorJS <https://annotatorjs.org/>
> >> is/was. People could just use e.g. its text highlighter function and
> >> ignore any of the other functionality.
> >>
> >>>      - The latest published version on npm is 0.2.0, which makes me
> >> believe
> >>>      that the APIs have not reached a stable milestone. Is that a fair
> >>>      assumption?
> >> We’ve indeed been open to the idea of tweaking the API still. I think it
> >> is needlessly complicated now for simple uses cases. A good first step
> >> would be making synchronous API and non-curried functions. (see e.g.
> >> issue #81 <https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/issues/81>,
> >> #115 <https://github.com/apache/incubator-annotator/issues/115>)
> >>>      - What would it take to bring the project to version 1.0?
> >> A version bump, I guess. ;)
> >>
> >> It’s largely a matter of taste when to call something ‘1.0’. Given the
> >> low activity and limited functionality it provides, I would still keep
> >> it at a version <1 to convey this immaturity. (Also, being an incubating
> >> Apache project, perhaps an eventual graduation would be a nice moment to
> >> call it 1.0).
> >>
> >>>      - Are you open to receive contributions on this, of course with some
> >>>      guidance from your team?
> >> Yes, as said above. People may however not have a lot of time for
> >> guidance..
> >>>      - The last dev call was probably last year in April 2022. Are they
> >>>      happening anymore anywhere else or just haven't happened since then?
> >> That could have been the last dev call indeed..
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Udit Desai
> >>> Mobile: +61-459-343-918
> >>>

Reply via email to