On Mon, Mar 2, 2020, 15:12 Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote: > Hi Annotator dev team. Congrats on getting to this exciting stage! >
Thank you! > I am just checking up on process. Are you following the traditional podling > release process: > https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#releases > I.e. first a vote on dev mailing list followed by a subsequent vote from > incubator general list? > Looks like this is the first round and once the 72 hour window closes > shortly you are all good to go for round 2, but I just wanted to check > expectations - doesn't seem you had a lot of feedback on that part of your > proposed process from a few weeks back. > There has been talk of a more streamlined process that might collapse the > two rounds but I wasn't aware that it had been enacted just yet - happy to > be told differently if that is the case. > Once again, thank you! I have lost track of how many times I went through every bit of documentation I could find on the podling release process, and somehow still managed to get this wrong. :sweat smile: I sent this vote to incubator general and annotator dev. Sounds like I should have started only with dev. Shall I close this vote, start another, and then raise it on general if it passes? Or should I close this and consider it a vote on the dev list, and just raise it with general? Finally, I'm having trouble finding the rules for what constitutes passing on the podling list. Are there any rules about PPMC votes? Or is it just that we need binding IPMC votes after it's raised to general?
