Keep the vote as a round 1 vote. Pretend you addressed it to dev and CC'd to general@incubator instead of the other way around. :-)
Normally incubator folks (apart from those who are also your mentors) wouldn't see anything until round 2 but it is not unheard of for podlings to CC incubator to keep them in the loop and get some extra eyeballs the first time around. The process seems a lot (and I guess it is) but once you have been through it a few times and automate a few of the bits, it becomes second nature. What you would normally do after a successful round 1 vote, is send again to general@incubator (most of the current info is fine to keep) plus have a link back to your dev vote, e.g. ponymail or mail archives. I'm a little fuzzy on the voting arrangements - it's been a while since I needed to worry about that bit. I believe you need 3 votes from your official committer list here: https://projects.apache.org/project.html?incubator-annotator So you have two binding votes plus one other vote so far if I read it correctly. For round 2, the IPMC votes are the binding ones (which can and should include one or more of your mentors). Cheers, Paul. On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 11:16 AM Randall Leeds <rand...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020, 15:12 Paul King <pa...@asert.com.au> wrote: > >> Hi Annotator dev team. Congrats on getting to this exciting stage! >> > > Thank you! > > >> I am just checking up on process. Are you following the traditional >> podling >> release process: >> https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#releases >> I.e. first a vote on dev mailing list followed by a subsequent vote from >> incubator general list? >> Looks like this is the first round and once the 72 hour window closes >> shortly you are all good to go for round 2, but I just wanted to check >> expectations - doesn't seem you had a lot of feedback on that part of your >> proposed process from a few weeks back. >> There has been talk of a more streamlined process that might collapse the >> two rounds but I wasn't aware that it had been enacted just yet - happy to >> be told differently if that is the case. >> > > Once again, thank you! > > I have lost track of how many times I went through every bit of > documentation I could find on the podling release process, and somehow > still managed to get this wrong. :sweat smile: > > I sent this vote to incubator general and annotator dev. Sounds like I > should have started only with dev. Shall I close this vote, start another, > and then raise it on general if it passes? Or should I close this and > consider it a vote on the dev list, and just raise it with general? > > Finally, I'm having trouble finding the rules for what constitutes passing > on the podling list. Are there any rules about PPMC votes? Or is it just > that we need binding IPMC votes after it's raised to general? >
