On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 25 April 2003 11:54, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> I don't want to use it as nested element of <classpath>, but as >> nested element of <javac>. > Why because it feels more natural? > and how (from an xml point-of-view)? One of the questions that usually get us stuck 8-) <classpath ant:type="PathThatIgnoresBuildSysclassPathToTrickGump"> or <PathThatIgnoresBuildSysclassPathToTrickGump ant:element="classpath"> are alternatives (without any claim for completeness) with quite different consequences when it comes to the implementation side of things. Neither would require any formal definition of roles. Stefan
