As a java developer, the try/catch seems more natural to me. I have spent some time working in a CM team, and realize that not everyone has a development background. The try/catch construct may not be familiar to everyone. Personally, I don't think that an enhanced 'sequential' will be an easier concept to grasp.
Dale
Dominique Devienne wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Dale Anson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What's the difference in use case between this and the try/catch from ant-contrib or antelope?
I'd say that it follows an existing pattern in Ant, and is less controversial maybe!? I'll just say I prefer an enhanced <sequential> myself, than <try>/<catch>, but that's just me. --DD
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
