> -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 11:23 AM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: failonerror; general solution > > Dale Anson wrote: > > What's the difference in use case between this and the try/catch from > > ant-contrib or antelope? I'd suggest grabbing the try/catch from either, > > and making it a core task. Just judging from the e-mail that I get, the > > try/catch task in antelope is one of the main reasons people download > it. > > I am +1 to trycatch, because it gives you better failure modes than just > 'ignore'; like the option to rollback or warn.
I'm +0 to trycatch, and +1 to enhancing <sequential> myself. --DD --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
