Pease be aware that the ns support has been removed from xmlfragment.
It should be added back in using DynamicConfiguratorNS.
Peter
Steve Loughran wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I propose that utils.XmlFragment is moved to typedefs and made to
extend Datatype;
Why do you want it to extend DataType at all?
hey this is cool, now that I am almost in europe, stefan can comment
on my ideas before waste time implementing them.
I want to do referencing so that you could go
<xmlfragment refid="payload" xmlns:f="something">
<f:foo>some XML here</f:foo/>
</xmlfragment>
And then later use it
<SoapPost>
<body refid="payload"/>
</SoapPost>
Of course the namespaces need to be resolved relative to the context
at time of declaration, not use.
This should not break anything *Except* the .net stuff in the
sandbox...
Don't worry about that. It will have to change to adapt to whatever
we'll invent as a namespace aware replacement for DynamicConfigurator
anyway.
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]