--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Matt Benson
>
> Sorry, what is your question?
>
If there is any reason why we couldn't/shouldn't have
a generic <task> DynamicConfigurator that could
execute an arbitrary task by classname, and a generic
<type> or <object>, probably also a
DynamicConfigurator, to instantiate (and optionally
configure) an arbitrary object, usu. to set as a
reference, but possibly for other things as well...
Kind of a shortcut to <taskdef>ing something you only
want to use once, or set dynamically...
-Matt
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
