+1 (include _svn in list of default excluded) Peter On 8/19/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kev Jackson wrote: > > On 19 Aug 2006, at 02:06, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > >> On Fri, 18 Aug 2006, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> If we reject automatically handling _svn directories (as a "hack" as >>> said by svn-people), we should document it in the manual of >>> <defaultexcludes> and svn-antlib with a reference (and a quotation) >>> of the svn statement. >> >> I was under the impression that consensus was forming around adding >> _svn/ to the default excludes unconditionally, not rejecting the idea. > > I think we should add it and document it in big bold letters! If it > truly is the only way that asp.net projects can use svn effectively, > then I suppose we need to support it, but we should warn that if you > have a 'normal' directory that happens to be called _svn you could > experience strange behaviour > > Regardless of what we do, we need to decide so that it can go into the > release, therefore: > > Default excludes to include the ASP.Net hack _svn directory for the > release of Ant 1.7.0 + svn antlib, and documentation to be updated to > reflect this change > > yes [ X] (my +1) > no [ ] > > Kev > -- > "All governments are in equal measure good and evil. The best ideal > is anarchy." - Leo Tolstoy > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 Antoine --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
