Steve Loughran wrote:
Kev Jackson wrote:
On 19 Aug 2006, at 02:06, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If we reject automatically handling _svn directories (as a "hack" as
said by svn-people), we should document it in the manual of
<defaultexcludes> and svn-antlib with a reference (and a quotation)
of the svn statement.
I was under the impression that consensus was forming around adding
_svn/ to the default excludes unconditionally, not rejecting the idea.
I think we should add it and document it in big bold letters! If it
truly is the only way that asp.net projects can use svn effectively,
then I suppose we need to support it, but we should warn that if you
have a 'normal' directory that happens to be called _svn you could
experience strange behaviour
Regardless of what we do, we need to decide so that it can go into
the release, therefore:
Default excludes to include the ASP.Net hack _svn directory for the
release of Ant 1.7.0 + svn antlib, and documentation to be updated to
reflect this change
+1
we could leave it to <defaultexcludes>, but that relies on the build
file author to get the exclusion list right, which means knowing that
they will be built on windows and that on some versions of SVN the dir
becomes _svn. Way too unlikely.
+1. What he said.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
