Hi,
I am an ant committer who has not been very active lately :(.
I volunteer to be a release manager for 1.8.0, or maybe co-release
manager with Stefan.
I do not know what is in the box currently and how mature we are. I
guess that if the other committers agree I could make a first alpha
release in the next days. I would have to dive again into
"ReleaseInstructions".
Regards,
Antoine
Adam Batkin wrote:
On 11/24/2009 05:10 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2009-11-23, Jesse Glick<jesse.gl...@sun.com> wrote:
I'm not sure backporting bug fixes is worth the effort when there is
nothing in particular holding up a 1.8.0 release that I know of.
Time, but that applies to any release.
I am planning to volunteer as release manager for 1.8.0 by the end of
the year - I had hoped to get to it earlier than that but real life got
into the way.
FWIW I wouldn't object a 1.7.2 release but completely lack the time to
support it.
From my POV the only things missing for a 1.8.0 release are proper
documentation of target-group and better documentation on the include
(and its difference WRT import) task. No biggies. I do have some
concerns because of the exec unit tests failures.
So if people on this list think that 1.8.0 will come out in a
reasonable timeframe (and/or at least seriously discuss a timeframe so
that people looking for critical fixes can plan appropriately) then I
can wait until then.
Otherwise I'd be interested in branching from 1.7.1, picking a bunch
of bugs and merging in those patches. I think the criteria for fixes
would have to be something like:
- Someone cares enough about the particular issue that they say that
it should be specifically included
- Fix already exists
- Fix is reasonably easy to merge in (i.e. doesn't depend on some
major structural change for 1.8.0)
- Fix is backwards compatible (except in cases where backwards
compatible means "totally broken")
I would be willing to take a stab at it. I'm not an Ant committer (and
don't expect to be made one any time soon, given that I just "walked
in off the street" and you have no idea who I am) so we'd need to
figure out something from a technical perspective. Perhaps I could
create a local Mercurial clone of the repository and push changes to
that, so that each commit could be viewed individually (rather than a
gigantic patch at the end).
Thanks,
-Adam Batkin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
