On 2009-11-25, Adam Batkin <a...@batkin.net> wrote: > So if people on this list think that 1.8.0 will come out in a > reasonable timeframe (and/or at least seriously discuss a timeframe so > that people looking for critical fixes can plan appropriately) then I > can wait until then.
I hope and believe this is the case. > Otherwise I'd be interested in branching from 1.7.1, picking a bunch > of bugs and merging in those patches. I think the criteria for fixes > would have to be something like: > - Someone cares enough about the particular issue that they say that > it should be specifically included This would probably be the most difficult part. Wading through the bugzilla list of fixed issues will take almost as long as creating the release 8-) > - Fix is reasonably easy to merge in (i.e. doesn't depend on some > major structural change for 1.8.0) Many will have been refactored later. > - Fix is backwards compatible (except in cases where backwards > compatible means "totally broken") There shouldn't be any change in Ant trunk (except for the new PropertyHelper API) that wouldn't qualify. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
