Sounds fine then.

-Jaikiran

On Monday, December 12, 2016, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Issues in the release process? Those would be handled by multiple release
> candidates. People normally only use alphas and betas for new projects or
> new major versions of projects at Apache.
>
> On 11 December 2016 at 19:53, J Pai <jai.forums2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm fine calling it a 2.4.1. The only reason I mentioned it as a beta is
to
>> iron out any issues involved in the process itself which, from what I
read
>> in the other thread, might involve certain challenges for the first time.
>>
>> -Jaikiran
>>
>> On Sunday, December 11, 2016, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Do we really need a beta release? If you're working on bugfixes first,
>> then
>> > a regular 2.4.1 release would be great. It would go through the normal
>> > Apache release candidate process, and perhaps we could get some Gradle
>> > developers to test it out as well since they still seem to be big users
>> of
>> > Ivy.
>> >
>> > Any committer to the Ant project could prepare the release and be a
>> release
>> > manager. The only requirements involving PMCs is to vote on approving
the
>> > release; adding your GPG key to the KEYS file (only PMCs can commit to
>> that
>> > repository involved); and committing the artifacts to the release svn
>> > repository (again, PMCs). I'm also not a committer, but if you're
>> > interested enough in maintaining Ivy, I'd guess that the PMCs may wish
to
>> > bring you on board to do so.
>> >
>> >
>> > On 11 December 2016 at 08:22, Jaikiran Pai <jai.forums2...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> First off, I'm not an Ivy or Ant committer. The proposal that I make
>> below
>> >> for an Ivy release is based on what was discussed in a recent mail
>> thread
>> >> about the future of Ivy https://www.mail-archive.com/d
>> >> e...@ant.apache.org/msg45078.html. There was a suggestion that someone
>> from
>> >> community volunteer to try and bring in some activity into the project
>> and
>> >> see if we can create a release after triaging the JIRA issues.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I have had a look at the open issues in JIRA today and decided to
filter
>> >> out issues that are open, updated since Jan 2014 and affects versions
>> 2.1,
>> >> 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4. I decided to use this as a filter criteria to just
>> select
>> >> a few that I thought can be considered "active". This [1] returns 57
>> >> issues. I went ahead and looked at those issues today and have asked
for
>> >> more information in the JIRAs wherever relevant and have sent a couple
>> of
>> >> pull requests [2] [3] to fix some straightforward ones. I also have
>> another
>> >> PR that I opened this week to fix one other issue. Out of those 57
>> issues,
>> >> many are no longer relevant or don't have enough details. I don't have
>> JIRA
>> >> privileges to label them, share filters or even assign some to myself
to
>> >> track them better. So I think for now, we can rely on that JIRA search
>> >> query [1].
>> >>
>> >> At this point, I think, if we can target March 2017 for releasing a
>> >> 2.4.1-Beta-1 with fixes from the list of JIRAs I think that would be a
>> good
>> >> start. Some of the issues noted in that JIRA are indeed important ones
>> and
>> >> would need some review/help in fixing them correctly, which
essentially
>> >> means, we need at least one person who has had experience with the Ivy
>> code
>> >> and its design details and also has the committer rights.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Does any of this look feasible? Let me know if this isn't enough to
move
>> >> things forward - I don't want to end up sending PRs and spending time
on
>> >> this if there's no way we can get to a proper release in the next few
>> >> months.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-1553?jql=project%
>> >> 20%3D%20IVY%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%
>> >> 20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20AND%20affectedVersion%20in%
>> >> 20(2.1.0%2C%202.2.0%2C%202.3.0%2C%202.4.0%2C%202.4.0-RC1)%
>> >> 20AND%20updated%20%3E%3D%202014-01-01%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC
>> >>
>> >> [2] https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/11
>> >>
>> >> [3] https://github.com/apache/ant-ivy/pull/12
>> >>
>> >> -Jaikiran
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
>

Reply via email to