On 2021-08-19, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > Hello Stefan,
> On 19/08/21 1:15 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> At a cursory glance I only see JUnitTask and ExecuteJava deal with the >> SecurityManager if permissions have been defined. Where else do we use >> one? > From what I see in the Java task code[1], the "execute()" method of > that task calls, "checkConfiguration()"[2] method, which in a > non-forked mode, creates a Permissions instance if no explicit > permissions has been configured[3]. I only searched for SecurityManager :-) Thanks. So we are using Ant's permissions system internally to preven System.exit, I see. This is the stuff we will need to replace with whatever is going to be the new API that prevents System.exit. Let's hope all this is not going to become an ugly hack. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
