On 14 May 2014 09:05, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 13/05/14 19:33, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote:
>>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> I apologize for taking a while to get this release candidate together. I
>> found some bus in Maven plugins
>
>
> a number 57 bus?
>
>
>> and it took a while to debug where they
>> were and which aspects of the release procedure they affected. Now however
>> it is fixed so that is all good. Please VOTE below on releasing Apache
>> Any23 1.0 (notice the jump from 0.9.1 --> 1.0). This will represent a
>> MAJOR
>> release for Any23.
>>
>> We solved N issues:
>> *http://s.apache.org/Ull <http://s.apache.org/Ull>*
>>
>> Git source tag (aae5baf3eb28e9c4bdffdbb4eab69ec012dc11a0):
>> *http://s.apache.org/O4S <http://s.apache.org/O4S>*
>>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheany23-1000/
>>
>> Staging artifacts:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/any23/1.0/
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using 48BAEBF6):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/any23/KEYS
>>
>> I would like to keep the vote open for at least 72 hours.
>> Thank you to everyone who is able to review this release candidate.
>> Thank you also to EVERYONE who has been monitoring, contributing towards
>> and using Apache Any23. The 1.0 release candidate signifies a major step
>> forward for the project and we are on the way up again :)
>>
>> [ ] +1, let's get it ruuuumbleeeeee!!!
>> [ ] +/-0, fine, but consider to fix few issues before...
>> [ ] -1, nope, because... (and please explain why)
>>
>> p.s. Here's my +1
>>
>
> +1
>
>         Andy
>
> Unclarity:
> org.kohsuke.metainf-services is MIT license? (not that source code is
> included so not a blocker for me) but I can't find it in LICENCES* for
> binaries.
> https://github.com/kohsuke/metainf-services/blob/master/pom.xml

If that dependency is a problem we can easily replace the annotations
with static files. I have recently been replacing them in other
projects as they don't play nice with Eclipse and M2E, due to the M2E
assumption that an annotation processor will never create a resource.

Cheers,

Peter

Reply via email to